I appreciate your well-said opinion. It sounds reasonable to me, and I
agree it was much harder to get information before the computer age. I
had to do research at a library, read medical journals and science
news, and study textbooks to get reliable info; that is also
considering the considerable medico-politico bias that is still a big
presence today, and most know it has been for the last 100 years.
Pauling was a giant, but not everyone liked his work.
Kathryn
On Jul 3, 2009, at 8:19 PM, Shirley Reed wrote:
About 50 years ago mention was made in some weekly reader or
something about how research on Vit. D was sparse. Yet, what had been
learned indicated that this nutrient just might be extremely important
in many ways. However, its un-patentability made greater research
unlikely or at least very slow. Since then I have been on the lookout
for more info on Vit. D. Only since computers became easily
accessible have I been able to get much more information. Now there
is tons of info and it nearly all points to a really great need for
more of this nutrient for nearly everyone. It seems it may actually
be some sort of master nutrient. There is much to be learned, but the
site www.vitamindcouncil.com will be very enlightening. What is going
on is that information that could once be suppressed for the money
interests of the few, can now be publicized far and wide by
computers. And it is being publicized. Similar to the information
about the connection between iodine deficiency and cancer, along with
loads of other easily preventable poor health conditions. My
opinion--considered and informed. Not medical advice. pj
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com
Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com
The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down...
List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
