There was an article recently on Rense (I think) where someone had done some research on a ton of products that used the term natural, and they found that 98% were either flat out fraud or deceptive, so relying on that term is not going to do much good. I knew the term didn't mean much, and I never put any faith in it, but I was surprised at how bad it is. That shows me that 98% of the companies out there using that term are not ethical, and do not care about their customes. Scary. Thora
_____ From: Dee Fitzpatrick [mailto:d...@deetroy.org] Sent: Sunday, July 05, 2009 11:27 AM To: silver-list@eskimo.com Subject: Re: CS>Vit. D 3 'hype' You know that, and I know that, Indi, but many people out there haven't a clue! The amount of people I have met who have no idea what is in 'products' as they are now called. Especially the ones termed 'natural' or organic. Even products designed for babies have it in. Probably why so many children suffer from eczema and asthma I suppose. Dee -------Original Message------- From: Indi <mailto:indi.sha...@gmail.com> Date: 07/05/09 18:54:23 To: silver-list@eskimo.com Subject: Re: CS>Vit. D 3 'hype' Anyway, it's not that hard to use soaps without SLS. Bronner's soap is the best, IMO. -- indi Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 8.5.386 / Virus Database: 270.13.5/2220 - Release Date: 07/05/09 17:54:00
<<faint_grain.jpg>>
