On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 09:12, Nenah Sylver wrote: > > > Garnet, > I am really fed up with this shit. Ozone itself is not toxic.
Interesting use of vocabulary Nenah. Particularly in light of your many essays. Ozone is indeed toxic as you yourself have stated. See below. > It has > traditionally been thought toxic due to the (1) contaminants and pollutants > that > it scavenges and tends to be around due to its natural activity, or (2) the > contaminants that are created by inferior equipment that produce ozone > improperly. > ____Of course ozone is toxic____ in large amounts that shouldn't be given to > the body -- which is similar to saying that hydrochloric acid or hydrogen > peroxide in small amounts is good for you but in higher concentrations can be > an > *irritant.* > > Irritant is not the same as a toxin, at least in my lexicology. Standard definitions are what makes communication possible. > > Since this is a public list and you seem intent on slandering me, I might as > well state explicitly that my doctorate is indeed from an accredited school. I > didn't want to dignify your insults with any more information. If you are so > curious about my academic past, you can always look it up on the net. It's > there. Have not slandered you Nenah, just have questions about your claims to have a doctorate level training. What sources would those be on the net Nenah? I have searched under both spellings of your name Nina Silver and Nenah Sylver. Found many interesting articles but nothing on your credentials. If you have a doctorate from an accredited institution why not just say which institution that is? The games only serve to make me wonder what your real agenda is? And to obtain a doctorate one must have at least a bachelor's degree? I see no statement to that effect in you bio or any articles or books you have published, at least the ones that I can view on the internet. > I don't need to be > accountable to you or anyone else. This concerns me. When you make statements that can endanger someone's safety or health you are certainly accountable Nenah. Why do you think you are not? > > I no longer try to take care of others, but try to respect people's ability to > take care of themselves and make their own choices and decisions. This statement is not supported by your refusal to fully disclose and your contradictory statements that ozone is not toxic and that it is toxic. Or that you have not informed yourself of the full literature on the properties of ozone to combine with other substances in a manner that forms toxic compounds. > > > She > > never acknowledged that I said it could be of benefit, instead tried to > > make it a black and white issue. > > I never understood from your posts before that you thought ozone could be of > benefit. Here is a statement from my first post on ozone: "The bottom line is that ozone is not a safe substance to play around with __if you do not know exactly what is in the air and the concentration of ozone___ in that air." Perhaps the lack of reading comprehension is the original problem. > > > She talks the talk but does she walk the walk is what you have to ask. > > Well, Garnet, I guess that's a question that anyone may ask regarding anyone > else. Actually though, I try to attend to my own affairs and keep my own > spiritual house in order. If I'm being judgmental, that may say more about me > than about the person I'm judging. > Yep it sure does Nenah! Garnet > > > > -- > The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. > > Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org > > To post, address your message to: [email protected] > Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > > Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected] > OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]> >
