singularity  

Messages by Date

• 2007/05/14 Re: Machine Motivation Gets Distorted Again [WAS Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page] Richard Loosemore
• 2007/05/14 RE: Machine Motivation Gets Distorted Again [WAS Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page] John G. Rose
• 2007/05/14 Re: Machine Motivation Gets Distorted Again [WAS Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page] Matt Mahoney
• 2007/05/14 Machine Motivation Gets Distorted Again [WAS Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page] Richard Loosemore
• 2007/05/14 Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page Matt Mahoney
• 2007/05/14 Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page Matt Mahoney
• 2007/05/14 Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page Eugen Leitl
• 2007/05/14 Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page Matt Mahoney
• 2007/05/14 Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page Matt Mahoney
• 2007/05/14 [singularity] Aubrey de Grey meets ZZ Top Benjamin Goertzel
• 2007/05/14 Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page Benjamin Goertzel
• 2007/05/14 Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page Eugen Leitl
• 2007/05/13 Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page Tom McCabe
• 2007/05/13 Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page Tom McCabe
• 2007/05/13 Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page Matt Mahoney
• 2007/05/13 Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page Matt Mahoney
• 2007/05/13 Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page Tom McCabe
• 2007/05/13 Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page Matt Mahoney
• 2007/05/13 Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page Tom McCabe
• 2007/05/13 Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page Tom McCabe
• 2007/05/13 Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page Tom McCabe
• 2007/05/13 Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page Benjamin Goertzel
• 2007/05/13 Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page Joshua Fox
• 2007/05/11 Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page Matt Mahoney
• 2007/05/11 Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page Eugen Leitl
• 2007/05/10 Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page Benjamin Goertzel
• 2007/05/10 Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page Matt Mahoney
• 2007/05/10 Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page Tom McCabe
• 2007/05/10 Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page Matt Mahoney
• 2007/05/10 Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page Bruce Klein
• 2007/05/09 [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page Stefan Pernar
• 2007/04/29 [singularity] Uh oh ... someone has beaten Novamente to the end goal! Benjamin Goertzel
• 2007/04/28 [singularity] Singularity; the video game Benjamin Goertzel
• 2007/04/28 [singularity] The Big AI Stumblingblocks Bruce LaDuke
• 2007/04/28 Re: [singularity] Why do you think your AGI design will work? Mike Tintner
• 2007/04/28 Re: [singularity] Why do you think your AGI design will work? Charles D Hixson
• 2007/04/28 Re: [singularity] Why do you think your AGI design will work? Mike Tintner
• 2007/04/27 Re: [singularity] Why do you think your AGI design will work? Charles D Hixson
• 2007/04/26 [singularity] ANNOUNCEMENT: ARTIFICIAL GENERAL INTELLIGENCE 2008 CONFERENCE Benjamin Goertzel
• 2007/04/26 Re: [singularity] Future of AI? Matt Bamberger
• 2007/04/26 Re: [singularity] News bit: Carnegie Mellon unveils Internet-controlled robots anyone can build Benjamin Goertzel
• 2007/04/26 Re: [singularity] News bit: Carnegie Mellon unveils Internet-controlled robots anyone can build Mike Tintner
• 2007/04/26 [singularity] News bit: Carnegie Mellon unveils Internet-controlled robots anyone can build Benjamin Goertzel
• 2007/04/26 Re: [singularity] Future of AI? Benjamin Goertzel
• 2007/04/26 [singularity] Future of AI? Clément Vidal
• 2007/04/26 Re: [singularity] Why do you think your AGI design will work? Stathis Papaioannou
• 2007/04/25 Re: [singularity] Re: Why do you think your AGI design will work? Benjamin Goertzel
• 2007/04/25 RE: [singularity] Why do you think your AGI design will work? Bruce LaDuke
• 2007/04/25 Re: [singularity] Re: Why do you think your AGI design will work? Mike Tintner
• 2007/04/25 Re: [singularity] Implications of an already existing singularity. Lúcio de Souza Coelho
• 2007/04/25 Re: [singularity] Implications of an already existing singularity. Matt Mahoney
• 2007/04/25 Re: [singularity] Implications of an already existing singularity. Eugen Leitl
• 2007/04/25 Re: [singularity] Re: Why do you think your AGI design will work? Richard Loosemore
• 2007/04/25 Re: [singularity] Implications of an already existing singularity. Colin Tate-Majcher
• 2007/04/25 Re: [singularity] Re: Why do you think your AGI design will work? Benjamin Goertzel
• 2007/04/25 Re: [singularity] Re: Why do you think your AGI design will work? Mike Tintner
• 2007/04/25 Re: [singularity] Why do you think your AGI design will work? Mike Tintner
• 2007/04/25 Re: [singularity] Why do you think your AGI design will work? Matt Mahoney
• 2007/04/25 Re: [singularity] Implications of an already existing singularity. Matt Mahoney
• 2007/04/25 RE: [singularity] Implications of an already existing singularity. John G. Rose
• 2007/04/25 Re: [singularity] Why do you think your AGI design will work? Benjamin Goertzel
• 2007/04/25 Re: [singularity] Why do you think your AGI design will work? Mike Tintner
• 2007/04/25 Re: [singularity] Implications of an already existing singularity. Samantha Atkins
• 2007/04/25 Re: [singularity] Implications of an already existing singularity. Samantha Atkins
• 2007/04/24 Re: [singularity] Why do you think your AGI design will work? Mike Tintner
• 2007/04/24 Re: [singularity] Why do you think your AGI design will work? Benjamin Goertzel
• 2007/04/24 Re: [singularity] Why do you think your AGI design will work? Mike Tintner
• 2007/04/24 Re: [singularity] Why do you think your AGI design will work? Matt Mahoney
• 2007/04/24 Re: [singularity] Why do you think your AGI design will work? Benjamin Goertzel
• 2007/04/24 Re: [singularity] Why do you think your AGI design will work? Mike Tintner
• 2007/04/24 Re: [singularity] Why do you think your AGI design will work? Matt Mahoney
• 2007/04/24 Re: [singularity] Why do you think your AGI design will work? Benjamin Goertzel
• 2007/04/24 Re: [singularity] Why do you think your AGI design will work? Mike Tintner
• 2007/04/24 [singularity] The University of Phoenix Test [was: Why do you think your AGI design will work?] Benjamin Goertzel
• 2007/04/24 Re: [singularity] Why do you think your AGI design will work? Matt Mahoney
• 2007/04/24 Re: [singularity] Why do you think your AGI design will work? Benjamin Goertzel
• 2007/04/24 Re: [singularity] Why do you think your AGI design will work? Eugen Leitl
• 2007/04/24 Re: [singularity] Why do you think your AGI design will work? Matt Mahoney
• 2007/04/24 [singularity] Why do you think your AGI design will work? Joshua Fox
• 2007/04/23 [singularity] Torboto - the Torture Robot Benjamin Goertzel
• 2007/04/20 Re: [singularity] Human Intelligence Andres Colon
• 2007/04/19 [singularity] singularity fiction Bill Hibbard
• 2007/04/18 Re: [singularity] Re: [tt] [agi] Definition of 'Singularity' and 'Mind' Richard Loosemore
• 2007/04/18 Re: [singularity] Re: [tt] [agi] Definition of 'Singularity' and 'Mind' Colin Tate-Majcher
• 2007/04/18 Re: [singularity] Human Intelligence Benjamin Goertzel
• 2007/04/18 Re: [singularity] Human Intelligence Eugen Leitl
• 2007/04/17 [singularity] Human Intelligence stephen white
• 2007/04/17 [singularity] Definition of 'Singularity' and 'Mind' Richard Loosemore
• 2007/04/13 [singularity] SIAI Spring 2007 Update Bruce Klein
• 2007/03/30 Re: [singularity] Implications of an already existing singularity. Matt Mahoney
• 2007/03/30 Re: [singularity] Implications of an already existing singularity. Matt Mahoney
• 2007/03/30 RE: [singularity] Implications of an already existing singularity. John Rose
• 2007/03/29 Re: [singularity] Implications of an already existing singularity. Charles D Hixson
• 2007/03/29 Re: [singularity] Implications of an already existing singularity. Tom McCabe
• 2007/03/29 Re: [singularity] Implications of an already existing singularity. Tom McCabe
• 2007/03/29 Re: [singularity] Implications of an already existing singularity. Matt Mahoney
• 2007/03/29 Re: [singularity] Implications of an already existing singularity. Matt Mahoney
• 2007/03/29 Re: [singularity] Implications of an already existing singularity. Jeff Rose
• 2007/03/29 Re: [singularity] Implications of an already existing singularity. Matt Mahoney
• 2007/03/29 Re: [singularity] Multiverse and Alien Singularities Joshua Fox יהושע פוקס
• 2007/03/28 Re: [singularity] Multiverse and Alien Singularities Chuck Esterbrook
• 2007/03/28 Re: [singularity] ESSAY: Artificial intelligence within our lifetime? Bruce LaDuke
• 2007/03/28 Re: [singularity] Implications of an already existing singularity. Tom McCabe
• 2007/03/28 RE: [singularity] Implications of an already existing singularity. Tom McCabe
• 2007/03/28 Re: [singularity] Implications of an already existing singularity. Tom McCabe
• 2007/03/28 Re: [singularity] Implications of an already existing singularity. Tom McCabe
• 2007/03/28 RE: [singularity] Implications of an already existing singularity. John Rose
• 2007/03/28 Re: [singularity] Implications of an already existing singularity. Matt Mahoney
• 2007/03/28 Re: [singularity] ESSAY: Artificial intelligence within our lifetime? Matt Mahoney
• 2007/03/28 Re: Entropy of the universe [WAS Re: [singularity] Implications of an already existing singularity.] Eugen Leitl
• 2007/03/28 Re: Entropy of the universe [WAS Re: [singularity] Implications of an already existing singularity.] Matt Mahoney
• 2007/03/28 Entropy of the universe [WAS Re: [singularity] Implications of an already existing singularity.] Richard Loosemore
• 2007/03/28 Re: [singularity] The establishment line on AGI Richard Loosemore
• 2007/03/28 Re: [singularity] Implications of an already existing singularity. Eugen Leitl
• 2007/03/28 Re: [singularity] Multiverse and Alien Singularities Matt Mahoney
• 2007/03/28 Re: [singularity] Implications of an already existing singularity. Matt Mahoney
• 2007/03/28 Re: [singularity] The establishment line on AGI Joshua Fox
• 2007/03/28 Re: [singularity] ESSAY: Artificial intelligence within our lifetime? Eugen Leitl
• 2007/03/28 Re: [singularity] Implications of an already existing singularity. Eugen Leitl
• 2007/03/28 Re: [singularity] Implications of an already existing singularity. Eugen Leitl
• 2007/03/28 Re: [singularity] Implications of an already existing singularity. Eugen Leitl
• 2007/03/27 Re: [singularity] Implications of an already existing singularity. Stathis Papaioannou
• 2007/03/27 [singularity] Multiverse and Alien Singularities John Ku
• 2007/03/27 Re: [singularity] ESSAY: Artificial intelligence within our lifetime? Matt Mahoney
• 2007/03/27 Re: [singularity] Implications of an already existing singularity. Craig
• 2007/03/27 Re: [singularity] Implications of an already existing singularity. Matt Mahoney
• 2007/03/27 [singularity] Implications of an already existing singularity. Eric B. Ramsay
• 2007/03/27 Re: [singularity] ESSAY: Artificial intelligence within our lifetime? Kaj Sotala
• 2007/03/27 Re: [singularity] ESSAY: Artificial intelligence within our lifetime? Kaj Sotala
• 2007/03/27 Re: [singularity] ESSAY: Artificial intelligence within our lifetime? Kaj Sotala
• 2007/03/26 RE: [singularity] ESSAY: Artificial intelligence within our lifetime? Bruce LaDuke
• 2007/03/26 Re: [singularity] ESSAY: Artificial intelligence within our lifetime? Richard Loosemore
• 2007/03/26 Re: [singularity] Candide and the Singularity Jef Allbright
• 2007/03/26 [singularity] Candide and the Singularity Ben Goertzel
• 2007/03/26 Re: [singularity] ESSAY: Artificial intelligence within our lifetime? Matt Mahoney
• 2007/03/24 Re: [singularity] ESSAY: Artificial intelligence within our lifetime? Kaj Sotala
• 2007/03/23 Re: [singularity] ESSAY: Artificial intelligence within our lifetime? Shane Legg
• 2007/03/23 [singularity] ESSAY: Artificial intelligence within our lifetime? Kaj Sotala
• 2007/03/22 Re: [singularity] The establishment line on AGI Richard Loosemore
• 2007/03/21 Re: [singularity] The establishment line on AGI Joshua Fox
• 2007/03/20 Re: [singularity] The establishment line on AGI Richard Loosemore
• 2007/03/20 Re: [singularity] The establishment line on AGI Joshua Fox
• 2007/03/19 Re: [singularity] The establishment line on AGI Shane Legg
• 2007/03/19 Re: [singularity] The establishment line on AGI Ben Goertzel
• 2007/03/19 Re: [singularity] The establishment line on AGI Shane Legg
• 2007/03/19 Re: [singularity] The establishment line on AGI Eugen Leitl
• 2007/03/19 Re: [singularity] The establishment line on AGI Richard Loosemore
• 2007/03/19 Re: [singularity] The establishment line on AGI Ben Goertzel
• 2007/03/19 [singularity] The establishment line on AGI Joshua Fox
• 2007/03/18 Re: [singularity] Philanthropy & Singularity Ben Goertzel
• 2007/03/18 Re: [singularity] Philanthropy & Singularity Samantha Atkins
• 2007/03/18 Re: [singularity] Philanthropy & Singularity Samantha Atkins
• 2007/03/18 Re: [singularity] Philanthropy & Singularity Samantha Atkins
• 2007/03/18 Re: [singularity] Philanthropy & Singularity Samantha Atkins
• 2007/03/18 Re: [singularity] Philanthropy & Singularity Joshua Fox
• 2007/03/16 Re: [singularity] Philanthropy & Singularity Mark Nuzzolilo
• 2007/03/16 Re: [singularity] Philanthropy & Singularity Joshua Fox
• 2007/03/16 Re: [singularity] Philanthropy & Singularity Adrian-Bogdan Morut
• 2007/03/16 Re: [singularity] Philanthropy & Singularity John-Michael
• 2007/03/16 Re: [singularity] Philanthropy & Singularity Adrian-Bogdan Morut
• 2007/03/15 [singularity] Philanthropy & Singularity John Ku
• 2007/03/13 Re: [singularity] AGI+LE Poll Question (results) Joshua Fox
• 2007/03/11 Re: [singularity] The Shtinkularity Bruce Klein
• 2007/03/11 Re: [singularity] The Shtinkularity Ben Goertzel
• 2007/03/11 RE: [singularity] The Shtinkularity pjmanney
• 2007/03/11 [singularity] The Shtinkularity Ben Goertzel
• 2007/03/11 Re: [singularity] Apology to the list, and a more serious commentary on AIXI Cenny Wenner
• 2007/03/09 [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe Keta Meme
• 2007/03/09 Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe (second thought!) Charles D Hixson
• 2007/03/09 Re: [singularity] Why We are Almost Certainly not in a Simulation Charles D Hixson
• 2007/03/09 Re: [singularity] Apology to the list, and a more serious commentary on AIXI Ben Goertzel
• 2007/03/09 Re: [singularity] Apology to the list, and a more serious commentary on AIXI Richard Loosemore
• 2007/03/09 Re: [singularity] Apology to the list, and a more serious commentary on AIXI Ben Goertzel
• 2007/03/09 Re: [singularity] Apology to the list, and a more serious commentary on AIXI Richard Loosemore
• 2007/03/09 Re: [singularity] Apology to the list, and a more serious commentary on AIXI Ben Goertzel
• 2007/03/09 Re: [singularity] Apology to the list, and a more serious commentary on AIXI Richard Loosemore
• 2007/03/09 Re: [singularity] Apology to the list, and a more serious commentary on AIXI Richard Loosemore
• 2007/03/08 Re: [singularity] Apology to the list, and a more serious commentary on AIXI Shane Legg
• 2007/03/08 RE: [singularity] Apology to the list, and a more serious commentary on AIXI Peter Voss
• 2007/03/08 Re: [singularity] Apology to the list, and a more serious commentary on AIXI Shane Legg
• 2007/03/08 RE: [singularity] Apology to the list, and a more serious commentary on AIXI Peter Voss
• 2007/03/08 Re: [singularity] Apology to the list, and a more serious commentary on AIXI Shane Legg
• 2007/03/08 Re: [singularity] Apology to the list, and a more serious commentary on AIXI Ben Goertzel
• 2007/03/08 Re: [singularity] Apology to the list, and a more serious commentary on AIXI Russell Wallace
• 2007/03/08 Re: [singularity] Apology to the list, and a more serious commentary on AIXI Richard Loosemore
• 2007/03/08 Re: [singularity] Apology to the list, and a more serious commentary on AIXI Ben Goertzel
• 2007/03/08 Re: [singularity] Apology to the list, and a more serious commentary on AIXI Richard Loosemore
• 2007/03/08 [singularity] Comments on AIXI and ad hominem innuendo in defense of it Richard Loosemore
• 2007/03/08 Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe (second thought!) Ben Goertzel
• 2007/03/08 Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe (second thought!) Shane Legg
• 2007/03/08 Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe (second thought!) Ben Goertzel
• 2007/03/08 Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe (second thought!) Shane Legg
• 2007/03/08 [singularity] Apology to the list, and a more serious commentary on AIXI Ben Goertzel
• 2007/03/08 Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe (second thought!) Ben Goertzel
• 2007/03/08 Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe (second thought!) Ben Goertzel
• 2007/03/08 Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe (second thought!) Shane Legg
• 2007/03/07 Re: [singularity] Why We are Almost Certainly not in a Simulation Stathis Papaioannou
• 2007/03/07 Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe (second thought!) Ben Goertzel
• 2007/03/07 Re: [singularity] Why We are Almost Certainly not in a Simulation Jeff Medina
• 2007/03/07 Re: [singularity] Scenarios for a simulated universe deering

• Earlier messages
• Later messages