singularity  

Messages by Date

• 2007/06/05 Re: [singularity] AI and politics Russell Wallace
• 2007/06/05 Re: [singularity] Bootstrapping AI Eugen Leitl
• 2007/06/04 Re: [singularity] Bootstrapping AI Eugen Leitl
• 2007/06/04 Re: [singularity] AI and politics Jey Kottalam
• 2007/06/04 Re: [singularity] Bootstrapping AI Tom McCabe
• 2007/06/04 Re: [singularity] Bootstrapping AI Lúcio de Souza Coelho
• 2007/06/04 RE: [singularity] Bootstrapping AI Tom McCabe
• 2007/06/04 Re: [singularity] Bootstrapping AI Tom McCabe
• 2007/06/04 Re: [singularity] Bootstrapping AI Tom McCabe
• 2007/06/04 Re: [singularity] Bootstrapping AI Tom McCabe
• 2007/06/04 Re: [singularity] Bootstrapping AI Matt Mahoney
• 2007/06/04 Re: [singularity] Bootstrapping AI Lúcio de Souza Coelho
• 2007/06/04 Re: [singularity] Bootstrapping AI Benjamin Goertzel
• 2007/06/04 RE: [singularity] Bootstrapping AI Papiewski, John
• 2007/06/04 Re: [singularity] Bootstrapping AI Benjamin Goertzel
• 2007/06/04 Re: [singularity] Bootstrapping AI Lúcio de Souza Coelho
• 2007/06/04 Re: [singularity] Bootstrapping AI Panu Horsmalahti
• 2007/06/04 Re: [singularity] Bootstrapping AI Matt Mahoney
• 2007/06/04 Re: [singularity] AI and politics Matt Mahoney
• 2007/06/04 Re: [singularity] Bootstrapping AI Panu Horsmalahti
• 2007/06/04 [singularity] Bootstrapping AI Papiewski, John
• 2007/06/04 [singularity] AI and politics Papiewski, John
• 2007/06/03 Re: [singularity] Re: Personal attacks stephen white
• 2007/06/02 [singularity] Donations to support open-source AGI research (SIAI Research Program) Benjamin Goertzel
• 2007/05/31 Re: Safe forms of AGI [WAS Re: [singularity] The humans are dead...] Roland Pihlakas
• 2007/05/31 Re: Safe forms of AGI [WAS Re: [singularity] The humans are dead...] Chuck Esterbrook
• 2007/05/30 Re: [singularity] Re: Personal attacks Benjamin Goertzel
• 2007/05/30 RE: [singularity] The humans are dead... Keith Elis
• 2007/05/30 RE: Safe forms of AGI [WAS Re: [singularity] The humans are dead...] Keith Elis
• 2007/05/30 Re: [singularity] critiques of Eliezer's views on AI (was: Re: Personal attacks) Russell Wallace
• 2007/05/30 [singularity] critiques of Eliezer's views on AI (was: Re: Personal attacks) Jey Kottalam
• 2007/05/30 Re: [singularity] Re: SL4 booting policy Russell Wallace
• 2007/05/30 RE: [singularity] Re: SL4 booting policy John G. Rose
• 2007/05/30 [singularity] Re: SL4 booting policy Aleksei Riikonen
• 2007/05/30 Re: [singularity] Re: Personal attacks Joshua Fox
• 2007/05/30 Re: SPAM: Re: SPAM: Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Samantha Atkins
• 2007/05/30 RE: [singularity] Re: Personal attacks John G. Rose
• 2007/05/30 [singularity] Aggressively scruffy with bemes Mike Tintner
• 2007/05/30 RE: SPAM: Re: SPAM: Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Jonathan H. Hinck
• 2007/05/30 Re: [singularity] Re: Personal attacks Russell Wallace
• 2007/05/29 Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Samantha Atkins
• 2007/05/29 Re: SPAM: Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Samantha Atkins
• 2007/05/29 Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Samantha Atkins
• 2007/05/29 Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Samantha Atkins
• 2007/05/29 Re: [singularity] Re: Personal attacks Samantha Atkins
• 2007/05/29 Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Samantha Atkins
• 2007/05/29 RE: [singularity] The humans are dead... Keith Elis
• 2007/05/29 RE: SPAM: Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Jonathan H. Hinck
• 2007/05/29 Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Russell Wallace
• 2007/05/29 Re: [singularity] Re: Personal attacks Benjamin Goertzel
• 2007/05/29 Re: [singularity] Re: Personal attacks Kaj Sotala
• 2007/05/29 RE: [singularity] The humans are dead... Jonathan H. Hinck
• 2007/05/29 RE: [singularity] The humans are dead... Mark
• 2007/05/29 Re: [singularity] Re: Personal attacks Randall Randall
• 2007/05/29 RE: [singularity] The humans are dead... Jonathan H. Hinck
• 2007/05/29 Re: [singularity] Re: Personal attacks Richard Loosemore
• 2007/05/29 Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Jef Allbright
• 2007/05/29 Re: [singularity] Re: Personal attacks Samantha Atkins
• 2007/05/29 Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Samantha Atkins
• 2007/05/29 Re: [singularity] Re: Personal attacks Richard Loosemore
• 2007/05/29 RE: [singularity] The humans are dead... Jonathan H. Hinck
• 2007/05/29 RE: [singularity] The humans are dead... Natasha Vita-More
• 2007/05/29 RE: [singularity] The humans are dead... Jonathan H. Hinck
• 2007/05/29 RE: [singularity] The humans are dead... Jonathan H. Hinck
• 2007/05/29 Safe forms of AGI [WAS Re: [singularity] The humans are dead...] Richard Loosemore
• 2007/05/29 Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Richard Loosemore
• 2007/05/29 Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Stathis Papaioannou
• 2007/05/29 Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Shane Legg
• 2007/05/29 Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... BillK
• 2007/05/29 Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Shane Legg
• 2007/05/28 Re: [singularity] Re: Personal attacks Benjamin Goertzel
• 2007/05/28 Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Russell Wallace
• 2007/05/28 [singularity] Re: Personal attacks Aleksei Riikonen
• 2007/05/28 Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Samantha Atkins
• 2007/05/28 Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Russell Wallace
• 2007/05/28 Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Samantha Atkins
• 2007/05/28 Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Russell Wallace
• 2007/05/28 Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Samantha Atkins
• 2007/05/28 Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Samantha Atkins
• 2007/05/28 RE: [singularity] The humans are dead... Keith Elis
• 2007/05/28 Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Russell Wallace
• 2007/05/28 Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Samantha Atkins
• 2007/05/28 Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Samantha Atkins
• 2007/05/28 Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Russell Wallace
• 2007/05/28 Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Samantha Atkins
• 2007/05/28 Re: [singularity] "Friendly" question... Samantha Atkins
• 2007/05/28 RE: [singularity] The humans are dead... Keith Elis
• 2007/05/28 Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Benjamin Goertzel
• 2007/05/28 Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Richard Loosemore
• 2007/05/28 RE: [singularity] The humans are dead... Keith Elis
• 2007/05/28 Re: [singularity] "Friendly" question... Richard Loosemore
• 2007/05/28 Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Joel Pitt
• 2007/05/28 RE: [singularity] The humans are dead... Keith Elis
• 2007/05/28 Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Russell Wallace
• 2007/05/28 Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Shane Legg
• 2007/05/28 Re: [singularity] "Friendly" question... Joshua Fox
• 2007/05/28 Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Shane Legg
• 2007/05/28 Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Samantha Atkins
• 2007/05/28 Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Richard Loosemore
• 2007/05/28 Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Samantha Atkins
• 2007/05/28 Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Samantha Atkins
• 2007/05/28 Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Jef Allbright
• 2007/05/28 RE: [singularity] The humans are dead... Keith Elis
• 2007/05/28 Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Stathis Papaioannou
• 2007/05/28 Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Stathis Papaioannou
• 2007/05/27 Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Samantha Atkins
• 2007/05/27 Re: [singularity] "Friendly" question... Samantha Atkins
• 2007/05/27 Re: [singularity] "Friendly" question... Richard Loosemore
• 2007/05/27 Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Jef Allbright
• 2007/05/27 Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Stathis Papaioannou
• 2007/05/27 Re: [singularity] "Friendly" question... Abram Demski
• 2007/05/27 Re: [singularity] "Friendly" question... Joshua Fox
• 2007/05/27 Re: [singularity] "Friendly" question... Abram Demski
• 2007/05/27 Re: [singularity] The humans are dead... Richard Loosemore
• 2007/05/27 [singularity] The humans are dead... Shane Legg
• 2007/05/27 Re: [singularity] "Friendly" question... Richard Loosemore
• 2007/05/27 Re: [singularity] "Friendly" question... John Ku
• 2007/05/27 Re: [singularity] "Friendly" question... Stathis Papaioannou
• 2007/05/27 Re: [singularity] "Friendly" question... John Ku
• 2007/05/26 Re: [singularity] "Friendly" question... Samantha Atkins
• 2007/05/26 Re: [singularity] "Friendly" question... John Ku
• 2007/05/26 Re: [singularity] "Friendly" question... Joshua Fox
• 2007/05/26 Re: [singularity] "Friendly" question... Samantha Atkins
• 2007/05/26 Re: [singularity] "Friendly" question... John Ku
• 2007/05/26 Re: [singularity] "Friendly" question... Stathis Papaioannou
• 2007/05/26 Re: [singularity] "Friendly" question... John Ku
• 2007/05/25 Re: [singularity] "Friendly" question... Richard Loosemore
• 2007/05/25 Re: [singularity] Bad "Friendly AI" poetry ;-) Jef Allbright
• 2007/05/25 Re: [singularity] Bad "Friendly AI" poetry ;-) Jef Allbright
• 2007/05/25 RE: [singularity] "Friendly" question... Jonathan H. Hinck
• 2007/05/25 Re: [singularity] Bad "Friendly AI" poetry ;-) Benjamin Goertzel
• 2007/05/25 Re: [singularity] Bad "Friendly AI" poetry ;-) Moshe Looks
• 2007/05/25 [singularity] Bad "Friendly AI" poetry ;-) Benjamin Goertzel
• 2007/05/25 RE: [singularity] "Friendly" question... Jonathan H. Hinck
• 2007/05/25 Re: [singularity] "Friendly" question... Benjamin Goertzel
• 2007/05/25 [singularity] "Friendly" question... Mason
• 2007/05/24 [singularity] AI dangers Joshua Fox
• 2007/05/22 Re: [singularity] Replicable Patterns of Breakthroughs Samantha Atkins
• 2007/05/22 Re: [singularity] Replicable Patterns of Breakthroughs Bruce Bautista
• 2007/05/22 Fwd: [singularity] Replicable Patterns of Breakthroughs Joshua Fox
• 2007/05/21 Re: [singularity] Replicable Patterns of Breakthroughs Joshua Fox
• 2007/05/20 Re: [singularity] Will AGI make us stupid? Christian Mauduit
• 2007/05/20 Re: [singularity] Will AGI make us stupid? Matt Mahoney
• 2007/05/20 Re: [singularity] Will AGI make us stupid? Matt Mahoney
• 2007/05/20 Re: [singularity] Will AGI make us stupid? qbkca84
• 2007/05/20 Re: [singularity] Will AGI make us stupid? Nathan Cook
• 2007/05/20 Re: [singularity] Will AGI make us stupid? Matt Mahoney
• 2007/05/20 Re: [singularity] Will AGI make us stupid? hpotter4
• 2007/05/20 Re: [singularity] Will AGI make us stupid? Benjamin Goertzel
• 2007/05/20 Re: [singularity] Will AGI make us stupid? Matt Mahoney
• 2007/05/20 Re: [singularity] Will AGI make us stupid? Benjamin Goertzel
• 2007/05/20 Re: [singularity] Will AGI make us stupid? Benjamin Goertzel
• 2007/05/20 [singularity] Will AGI make us stupid? Matt Mahoney
• 2007/05/20 Re: [singularity] Replicable Patterns of Breakthroughs Matt Mahoney
• 2007/05/19 Re: [singularity] Replicable Patterns of Breakthroughs Mark H. Herman
• 2007/05/19 Re: [singularity] Replicable Patterns of Breakthroughs Matt Mahoney
• 2007/05/18 [singularity] Replicable Patterns of Breakthroughs Mark H. Herman
• 2007/05/17 Re: Neural language models (was Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page) Matt Mahoney
• 2007/05/17 Re: Neural language models (was Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page) Richard Loosemore
• 2007/05/17 Re: Neural language models (was Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page) Matt Mahoney
• 2007/05/17 Re: Neural language models (was Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page) Richard Loosemore
• 2007/05/17 Re: Neural language models (was Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page) Matt Mahoney
• 2007/05/17 Re: Neural language models (was Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page) Richard Loosemore
• 2007/05/16 Re: Neural language models (was Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page) Matt Mahoney
• 2007/05/16 Re: Neural language models (was Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page) Matt Mahoney
• 2007/05/16 Re: Machine Motivation Gets Distorted Again [WAS Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page] Shane Legg
• 2007/05/15 RE: Machine Motivation Gets Distorted Again [WAS Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page] John G. Rose
• 2007/05/15 Re: Neural language models (was Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page) Richard Loosemore
• 2007/05/15 Re: Machine Motivation Gets Distorted Again [WAS Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page] Richard Loosemore
• 2007/05/15 Re: Neural language models (was Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page) Tom McCabe
• 2007/05/15 Re: Machine Motivation Gets Distorted Again [WAS Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page] Tom McCabe
• 2007/05/15 Re: Machine Motivation Gets Distorted Again [WAS Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page] Tom McCabe
• 2007/05/15 Re: Machine Motivation Gets Distorted Again [WAS Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page] Tom McCabe
• 2007/05/15 Re: Machine Motivation Gets Distorted Again [WAS Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page] Tom McCabe
• 2007/05/15 RE: Machine Motivation Gets Distorted Again [WAS Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page] Tom McCabe
• 2007/05/15 Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page Tom McCabe
• 2007/05/15 Re: Neural language models (was Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page) Bo Morgan
• 2007/05/15 Re: Neural language models (was Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page) Matt Mahoney
• 2007/05/15 Re: Neural language models (was Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page) Richard Loosemore
• 2007/05/15 Neural language models (was Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page) Matt Mahoney
• 2007/05/15 Re: Machine Motivation Gets Distorted Again [WAS Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page] Eric B. Ramsay
• 2007/05/15 Re: Machine Motivation Gets Distorted Again [WAS Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page] Richard Loosemore
• 2007/05/15 Re: Machine Motivation Gets Distorted Again [WAS Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page] Matt Mahoney
• 2007/05/15 [singularity] Re: Machine Motivation Gets Distorted Again Richard Loosemore
• 2007/05/15 Re: Machine Motivation Gets Distorted Again [WAS Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page] Benjamin Goertzel
• 2007/05/15 Re: Machine Motivation Gets Distorted Again [WAS Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page] Richard Loosemore
• 2007/05/15 Re: Machine Motivation Gets Distorted Again [WAS Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page] Shane Legg
• 2007/05/15 Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page Benjamin Goertzel
• 2007/05/15 Re: Machine Motivation Gets Distorted Again [WAS Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page] Benjamin Goertzel
• 2007/05/15 Re: Machine Motivation Gets Distorted Again [WAS Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page] Shane Legg
• 2007/05/15 Re: Machine Motivation Gets Distorted Again [WAS Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page] Stathis Papaioannou
• 2007/05/15 RE: Machine Motivation Gets Distorted Again [WAS Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page] John G. Rose
• 2007/05/15 Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page Eugen Leitl
• 2007/05/14 Re: Machine Motivation Gets Distorted Again [WAS Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page] Tom McCabe
• 2007/05/14 RE: Machine Motivation Gets Distorted Again [WAS Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page] Tom McCabe
• 2007/05/14 Re: Machine Motivation Gets Distorted Again [WAS Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page] Tom McCabe
• 2007/05/14 Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page Tom McCabe
• 2007/05/14 Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page Tom McCabe
• 2007/05/14 Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page Tom McCabe
• 2007/05/14 Re: [singularity] Help get the 400k SIAI matching challenge on DIGG's front page Tom McCabe

• Earlier messages
• Later messages