Dean, Well, just how exactly do we go about resolving the various Identify issues (E.164 / SBCs / gateways)? I think Dan has tried unsuccessfully for a BoF earlier. No agenda time in SIP this time. There have been some huge email threads since Philadelphia. There are several relevant drafts around (and possibly more before Dublin).
John > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Dean Willis > Sent: 24 June 2008 20:20 > To: [email protected] > Cc: Keith Drage > Subject: [Sip] Let's talk about a Dublin agenda > > > I've been tipped off that we may be down to as little as two > hours (or > maybe 2.5) of meeting time in Dublin due to additional WG and BOF > events that didn't make it onto the earlier published agenda (like > MEDIACTRL). > > What are the absolutely most important things we need to talk about? > What is the best possible use of our very valuable and very scarce > time together? > > I suspect that going by-rote through the list of open milestones is > not the best use of our time. > > Topics that I think we might want to talk about include but are not > limited to: > > Agenda bash and announcements usually use 10 minutes > > 1) Using SAML for SIP. > -- Milestone was Dec. 2007 > -- Author has promised new rev before meeting > -- Is the WG committed to doing this work? > -- 10 minutes? > > 2) Test Matrix for SIP to Draft Standard > -- Milestone was Feb 2008 > -- How are we going to move forward? > -- 10 minutes > > 3) Delivery of Request URI and Parameters to UAS Through Proxy > -- Milestone was Feb 2008 > -- Conversation has lagged. Do we see a workable solution? > -- 30 minutes? > > 4) DTLS-SRTP > -- Milestone was Feb 2008 > -- Delayed by the RFC 4474/Gateway/B2BUA > -- Decide: Do we hold DTLS-SRTP or publish with a caveat? > -- EKR may not be attending, can we resolve on-list? (no time?) > > 5) Mechanisms for UA Initiated Privacy > -- Milestone is July 2008 > -- Author has promised new rev before meeting > -- 20 minutes? > > 6) Termination of early Dialog Prior to Final Response (199) > -- Milestone is November 2008 > -- Substantial list activity > -- 30 minutes? > > 7) Guidelines for SIP Extension Modalities > -- No milestone > -- Needs conceptual discussion > -- Defer until #8 below is resolved? (no time?) > > 8) The INFO solution and Paul's compromise for historical registration > -- No milestone > -- Previous WG consensus to "do something" > -- 40 minutes? > > > Am I missing something that is critically important? > > Which topics do we really need to talk about in order to move forward? > _______________________________________________ > Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
