> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Dean Willis > Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2008 3:38 PM > To: Elwell, John > Cc: [email protected]; Keith Drage > Subject: Re: [Sip] Let's talk about a Dublin agenda > > > On Jun 24, 2008, at 3:17 PM, Elwell, John wrote: > > >> > >> > >> 2) For the remainder, I'd like to suggest the "REal Time > >> Identity and > >> Role Expression" (RETIRE) Working Group, which would take > >> over the RFC > >> 4474 revision along with SIP-SAML. > > [JRE] Will that produce results before we all retire? But > seriously, a > > new WG might be a good idea, but how long to set it up? What needs > > to be > > done at or before Dublin in that direction? > > Well, a new working group starts with a BOF request and a draft > charter and somebody who wants the WG badly enough to do the > leg work and chair the BOF.
You say that as if nobody tried before. I requested a BoF for Philadelphia, called Discussion and Analysis of SIP Identity (DASI). It was turned down by the IESG, and did not have the support of the RAI ADs. I have received no indication that additional people in SIP cared about the problem (beyond the ~6 or so involved in the thread we had on the list), nor an indication from the RAI ADs that our email threads on SIP after the Philadelphia meeting had swayed their opinion. I could continue to beat my head against the wall, but I can't see through the blood as it is. > It's a little late in the cycle to get one of those in for > Dublin, but we could certainly start talking about a draft > charter, then run a BOF at the next meeting. That would fit > squarely with my goal of ramping down the "eternal SIP group" > by fall 2009. -d _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
