On Jun 24, 2008, at 3:17 PM, Elwell, John wrote:
2) For the remainder, I'd like to suggest the "REal Time
Identity and
Role Expression" (RETIRE) Working Group, which would take
over the RFC
4474 revision along with SIP-SAML.
[JRE] Will that produce results before we all retire? But seriously, a
new WG might be a good idea, but how long to set it up? What needs
to be
done at or before Dublin in that direction?
Well, a new working group starts with a BOF request and a draft
charter and somebody who wants the WG badly enough to do the leg work
and chair the BOF.
It's a little late in the cycle to get one of those in for Dublin, but
we could certainly start talking about a draft charter, then run a BOF
at the next meeting. That would fit squarely with my goal of ramping
down the "eternal SIP group" by fall 2009.
--
Dean
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
