On Jun 24, 2008, at 5:55 PM, Dan Wing wrote:
Well, a new working group starts with a BOF request and a draft
charter and somebody who wants the WG badly enough to do the
leg work and chair the BOF.
You say that as if nobody tried before. I requested a BoF for
Philadelphia, called Discussion and Analysis of SIP Identity
(DASI). It was turned down by the IESG, and did not have the
support of the RAI ADs.
True, However, the approach you took at that time wasn't clearly
coordinated as a handoff of responsibility from the SIP working group.
That's what I propose to try now.
We should also consider that much of the proposed work of RUCUS
(Reducing Unwanted Communications Using SIP), aka anti-SPIT, depend on
strong identity.
--
Dean
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
