> >> Well, a new working group starts with a BOF request and a draft > >> charter and somebody who wants the WG badly enough to do the > >> leg work and chair the BOF. > > > > You say that as if nobody tried before. I requested a BoF for > > Philadelphia, called Discussion and Analysis of SIP Identity > > (DASI). It was turned down by the IESG, and did not have the > > support of the RAI ADs. > > True, However, the approach you took at that time wasn't clearly > coordinated as a handoff of responsibility from the SIP > working group.
True. > That's what I propose to try now. Ok. > We should also consider that much of the proposed work of RUCUS > (Reducing Unwanted Communications Using SIP), aka anti-SPIT, > depend on strong identity. Yes, it does. -d _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
