Dean, > -----Original Message----- > From: Dean Willis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 24 June 2008 20:48 > To: Elwell, John > Cc: [email protected]; Keith Drage > Subject: Re: [Sip] Let's talk about a Dublin agenda > > > On Jun 24, 2008, at 2:38 PM, Elwell, John wrote: > > > Dean, > > > > Well, just how exactly do we go about resolving the various Identify > > issues (E.164 / SBCs / gateways)? I think Dan has tried > unsuccessfully > > for a BoF earlier. No agenda time in SIP this time. There > have been > > some > > huge email threads since Philadelphia. There are several relevant > > drafts > > around (and possibly more before Dublin). > > > > My suggestion is in two parts: > > 1) For DTLS-SRTP Framework, simply document the limitation of > RFC 4474 > and move on. This is a one-paragraph add to the framework. > > 2) For the remainder, I'd like to suggest the "REal Time > Identity and > Role Expression" (RETIRE) Working Group, which would take > over the RFC > 4474 revision along with SIP-SAML. [JRE] Will that produce results before we all retire? But seriously, a new WG might be a good idea, but how long to set it up? What needs to be done at or before Dublin in that direction?
John > > -- > Dean > > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
