On Jul 17, 2008, at 9:59 AM, Robert Sparks wrote:
On Jul 17, 2008, at 12:05 AM, Dean Willis wrote:
On Jul 16, 2008, at 6:26 PM, Hisham Khartabil wrote:
Having looked at the agenda, I think we can do without the 2nd
session. What I mean is that we can remove presentations from the
1st session that we don't think need face time (Robert pointed at
a couple) and move the ones requiring face time from the 2nd
session to the 1st.
Well, I have to say I based the invfix and steps-to-draft times on
Robert's request from last week, so I'm surprised but not unhappy
about the suggestion to nuke them.
I did not offer to remove steps-to-draft - we do need face time on
that.
And I mentioned when I scheduled invfix that we could pull it if
there were no comments before the meeting.
Okay, that makes sense. The only invfix comments I've seen so far have
been typographical.
Does anybody have issues of substance to discuss face to face?
---
Dean
_______________________________________________
Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip
This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip
Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
