Christer, The 2nd session conflits with DRINKS, therefore you will find that it may well end up having all the unimportant topics discussed in it. I therefore suggested cancelling that session compeletly. I really believe important topics can be queezed into the one session.
Regards, Hisham On 17/07/2008, Christer Holmberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > As I said earlier, I see no major issue with 199 at this point which would > require face-to-face discussions. I could give a status update, but that > would only take about 5 minutes. > > I think we DO need to decided, based on Keith's requirement questions etc, > how to move forward with keep. > > I also think two slots now give us a good opportunity to discuss (and > decide) what to do with INFO, so I really think we should use the two slots > that have been given to us. > > Regards, > > Christer > > ________________________________ > > Lähettäjä: [EMAIL PROTECTED] puolesta: Robert Sparks > Lähetetty: ke 16.7.2008 23:20 > Vastaanottaja: Dean Willis > Kopio: SIP IETF; Cullen Jennings > Aihe: Re: [Sip] Draft agenda, SIP at IETF 72 > > > > This is a really good place to start bashing from. Thanks for going > through the pain it takes to put this together. > > Everyone should take note that the second session has a RAI conflict > (with DRINKS) and think through where to put conversations so that > we minimize the pain caused by the necessary split of people. > > I think I'd rather see the large, architectural questions, > INFO and Identity, moved into the conflict free spot and > put topics with a smaller constituency into the second session. > > I also think people across the working group should chime in with what > they think > the three most important _DRAFTS_ to talk about, in person, at this > meeting are. > I strongly suspect there's a surprise or two that will come out of that. > > I'll throw my own list in later (because I want to think awhile about > what's _not_ > in the proposed agenda), but to help tune things early: > > I do want to talk about 199. > > I don't see why we should spend face time on sip-keep at this point. > > I think we can get away without face time on record-route fix. > (its unlikely at this late stage that we'll find a crisis to work > through there). > > I have received very little feedback on invfix, and I don't think > we need to spend any in-meeting time on the essential > corrections process itself. So, I propose we take that entire > topic to the list and/or hallways. I'll take on pushing a few > key folks to review the big recent changes to invfix and > speak up that they've done so before we get to the meetings. > > Everybody else: If you hold the token on any of the other drafts and > feel you can > resolve any issues you currently have the same way, I strongly urge > you to propose something similar for your time. > > > RjS > > > > On Jul 16, 2008, at 10:45 AM, Dean Willis wrote: > > > > > This is the draft agenda for the SIP meeting at IETF 72 in Dublin. > > > > * Note that this agenda is subject to change based on list > > conversations > > > > * Note that we're still trying to work out how to have the > > "Identity" discussion > > > > Pretty HTML is at: > > http://www.softarmor.com/mediawiki/index.php/SIP_Agenda_IETF_72 > > > > Text follows > > > > ----------------- > > > > Agenda for SIP at IETF 72, Primary Session, Tuesday July 29, 2008, > > 1300-1500, Convention 3 > > > > Agenda Bash > > Chairs > > 10 > > > > Using SAML for SIP > > Chairs > > draft-ietf-sip-saml-04 > > 10 > > > > Identify requirements for test matrix to move SIP to Draft Standard > > Robert Sparks > > draft-sparks-sip-steps-to-draft-00 > > 20 > > > > Essential corrections to RFC 3261 (1st batch) > > Robert Sparks > > draft-sparks-sip-invfix-02 > > 15 > > > > Delivery of Request URI and Parameters to UAS Through Proxy > > Speaker TBD > > draft-rosenberg-sip-ua-loose-route-02 > > draft-holmberg-sip-target-uri-delivery-01 > > 25 > > > > > > Mechanisms for UA Initiated Privacy > > Mayumi Munakata > > draft-ietf-sip-ua-privacy-02 > > 15 > > > > MIME body handling in SIP > > Gonzalo Camarillo > > draft-ietf-sip-body-handling-02 > > 15 > > > > Guidelines for double route recording > > Thomas Froment > > draft-ietf-sip-record-route-fix-03 > > Time TBD > > > > Keepalive Without Outbound > > Christer Holmberg > > draft-holmberg-sip-keep-01 > > 10 > > > > > > Agenda for SIP at IETF 72, Primary Session, Thursday July 31, 2008, > > 1510-1610, Convention 3 > > > > Agenda Bash > > Chairs > > 5 > > > > Termination of early dialog prior to final response > > Christer Holmberg > > draft-ietf-sip-199-00 > > 20 > > > > INFO > > Speaker TBD > > draft-burger-sip-info-02 > > draft-kaplan-sip-info-events-01 > > draft-rosenberg-sip-info-litmus-01 > > draft-kaplan-sipping-dtmf-package-00 > > draft-willis-sip-infopackage-00 > > 35 > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol > > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip > > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip > > _______________________________________________ > Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip > > > _______________________________________________ > Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip > This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip > Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip >
_______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
