> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Elwell, John > > > > 5) We didn't schedule the clash with DRINKS. We suffer > > from the problem that there are too many RAI groups, and some > > of them ask for more time than they need (and some of them > > get their requests in late!). People propose sets of groups > > that can meet in parallel, but seem unable to agree on the > > split.
Nope, not your fault, nor anyone's - and I don't think anyone thinks or claimed it was. But I think actually that the parallel groups suggested on the RAI mailing list had no dissenters; and regardless, it's really just unfair to make SIP conflict with anything in RAI. But I'll take this topic to the RAI list. -hadriel _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
