Nobody is talking about a "second version" of outbound. Somebody just need to write a draft on high-availability.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Juha Heinanen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, October 10, 2008 12:39 > To: Audet, Francois (SC100:3055) > Cc: Dean Willis; [email protected]; Christer Holmberg > Subject: RE: [Sip] Dual registration without Outbound > > Francois Audet writes: > > > But it's not currently in the spec. I view it as something > of high > priority that we should be looking at. But we'll > never get there if we > don't get outbound out the door first. > > it takes years for UA vendors to implement outbound draft and > more than 10 years the followup version. by then, sip may be > already replaced by something else. so if you want outbound > to have any value, it needs to be get right the first shot. > > also, it was not clear to me (and looks like also some > experts), what instance-id means and what effect it has to > forking to multiple contacts. if everything in outbound is > not crystal clear, it makes no sense to publish it. > > -- juha > > _______________________________________________ Sip mailing list https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/sip This list is for NEW development of the core SIP Protocol Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for questions on current sip Use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for new developments on the application of sip
