On 11/2/2012 12:56 PM, George Niculae wrote:
On Friday, November 2, 2012, Kumaran
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> On 10/31/2012 6:58 PM, George Niculae wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Kumaran
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi All,
>> Registrar doesn't check the internal extension before
processing the
>> calls through dial plan if registered user doesn't have phone and VM
>> permission when dial plan having External number "Any Number" and
>> without "Prefix value"...So it valid behavior?
>>
>
> Sorry, that's not quite tangible, can you detail the scenario steps?
> George
>
> Hi George,
> Please check the following scenario
> 1.user 200 with polycom phone with local permission
> 2.user 201 without phone and VM permission
> 3.Local dial plan with FXO gateway which allow any numbers and
without prefix value
> 4.user 200 calls 201
> 5.user 200 call established with FXO
> So this behavior is valid?But we won't have issue if VM is enabled
or user have registered phone
Thanks. Is this 4.6 or 4.4? What happens when you call conferences?
George
I checked in 4.6 George...No issues with other extension..Only user
extension is having issue...If VM or phone is enabled then Registrar
consider this as a valid internal Extension so call will directed
particular user..But if user doesn't have phone and vm then registrar
not considering as internal extension and process it through local dial
plan because it has permission for allow calls with any number...
Regards,
Kumaran T
_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
