if the user is not registered, the call is not authorized by the system. it will however be able to call "into" the system but whether the call works or not (contact header) is another thing altogether.
To call INTO a system, you do not need permissions. I don't think we'd want to block incoming sip calls. That's a self defeat mechanism. Phone systems should accept calls. On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 5:22 AM, Kumaran < [email protected]> wrote: > On 11/2/2012 2:35 PM, George Niculae wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 11:03 AM, Kumaran < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> On 11/2/2012 2:26 PM, George Niculae wrote: >> >> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Kumaran < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On 11/2/2012 1:19 PM, George Niculae wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Kumaran < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> On 11/2/2012 12:56 PM, George Niculae wrote >>>> >>>> I checked in 4.6 George...No issues with other extension..Only user >>>> extension is having issue...If VM or phone is enabled then Registrar >>>> consider this as a valid internal Extension so call will directed >>>> particular user..But if user doesn't have phone and vm then registrar not >>>> considering as internal extension and process it through local dial plan >>>> because it has permission for allow calls with any number... >>>> >>>> >>> When you say "user 201 without phone " this means without phone >>> registered? >>> >>> George >>> >>> Yes George...No phone assigned to user 201... >>> >> >> Please bare with me - there's a difference between no phone assigned to >> user 201 (which could mean no phone configured in sipXconfig) and no phone >> registered for that user (you can register phones that are not managed by >> sipxecs). So if no phone registered, where is this call established in step >> 5 of your scenario? >> >> 5.user 200 call established with FXO >> >> Thanks >> George >> >> I mean registered and assigned are same meaning(no phone configured or >> register in sipXconfig for user 201)...Consider 201 is newly created user >> without VM permission...Wrt pt-5 Local dial plan allow any numbers so >> register is sending contact in 302 moved temp as -- Contact: <sip:201@* >> 176.25.3.31*(FXO ip >> address);user=phone;sipxecs-lineid=1;sipXecs-CallDest=LOCL?expires=7200&ROUTE=%3Csip% >> 3Asipx-test.ttplservices.com%3Blr%3E>;q=0.9 and establish the call >> >> > So call between 200 and 201 is established but 201 doesn't have phone > registered? > > George > > Yes George but 201 will be considered as outside number and not > internal number... > > Regards, > Kumaran T > > _______________________________________________ > sipx-dev mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/ > -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 sip: [email protected] Fax: 434.465.6833 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Linked-In Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/tony-graziano/14/4a6/7a4 Ask about our Internet Fax services! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Using or developing for sipXecs from SIPFoundry? Ask me about sipX-CoLab 2013! <http://sipxcolab2013.eventbrite.com/?discount=tony2013> -- LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 sip: [email protected] Helpdesk Customers: http://myhelp.myitdepartment.net Blog: http://blog.myitdepartment.net
_______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
