On 11/2/2012 2:26 PM, George Niculae wrote:
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 10:51 AM, Kumaran
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On 11/2/2012 1:19 PM, George Niculae wrote:
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Kumaran
<[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On 11/2/2012 12:56 PM, George Niculae wrote
I checked in 4.6 George...No issues with other
extension..Only user extension is having issue...If VM or
phone is enabled then Registrar consider this as a valid
internal Extension so call will directed particular user..But
if user doesn't have phone and vm then registrar not
considering as internal extension and process it through
local dial plan because it has permission for allow calls
with any number...
When you say "user 201 without phone" this means without phone
registered?
George
Yes George...No phone assigned to user 201...
Please bare with me - there's a difference between no phone assigned
to user 201 (which could mean no phone configured in sipXconfig) and
no phone registered for that user (you can register phones that are
not managed by sipxecs). So if no phone registered, where is this call
established in step 5 of your scenario?
5.user 200 call established with FXO
Thanks
George
I mean registered and assigned are same meaning(no phone configured or
register in sipXconfig for user 201)...Consider 201 is newly created
user without VM permission...Wrt pt-5 Local dial plan allow any numbers
so register is sending contact in 302 moved temp as -- Contact:
<sip:201@*176.25.3.31*(FXO ip
address);user=phone;sipxecs-lineid=1;sipXecs-CallDest=LOCL?expires=7200&ROUTE=%3Csip%3Asipx-test.ttplservices.com%3Blr%3E>;q=0.9
and establish the call
Regards,
Kumaran T
_______________________________________________
sipx-dev mailing list
[email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
