On 11/2/2012 1:19 PM, George Niculae wrote:
On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Kumaran <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:On 11/2/2012 12:56 PM, George Niculae wrote I checked in 4.6 George...No issues with other extension..Onlyuser extension is having issue...If VM or phone is enabled then Registrar consider this as a valid internal Extension so call willdirected particular user..But if user doesn't have phone and vm then registrar not considering as internal extension and process it through local dial plan because it has permission for allow calls with any number... When you say "user 201 without phone" this means without phone registered? George
Yes George...No phone assigned to user 201... Regards, Kumaran T
_______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
