On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Kumaran < thiru.venkateshwa...@ttplservices.com> wrote:
> On 11/2/2012 12:56 PM, George Niculae wrote > > I checked in 4.6 George...No issues with other extension..Only user > extension is having issue...If VM or phone is enabled then Registrar > consider this as a valid internal Extension so call will directed > particular user..But if user doesn't have phone and vm then registrar not > considering as internal extension and process it through local dial plan > because it has permission for allow calls with any number... > > When you say "user 201 without phone " this means without phone registered? George
_______________________________________________ sipx-dev mailing list sipx-dev@list.sipfoundry.org List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-dev/
