It is possible. They have a million options, I know that much.
Pressing pound does force the call to dial immediately.

I know. It isn't a great device. For the price, and for what I need it 
to do, it is worth a try. I have 2 audiocodes MP 114s on the way too, 
but I know you aren't a big fan of audiocodes either.

On 2/18/2010 4:43 PM, Tony Graziano wrote:
> Methinks these devices suck rottens eggs.
>
> In any case, what happens if you end the dialed number with its dial string
> termination character (#?)? Does that speed it up?
>
> When I need a cheap device I cringe, because the time ain't worth the
> troubles.
> ============================
> Tony Graziano, Manager
> Telephone: 434.984.8430
> Fax: 434.984.8431
>
> Email: [email protected]
>
> LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk:
> Telephone: 434.984.8426
> Fax: 434.984.8427
>
> Helpdesk Contract Customers:
> http://www.myitdepartment.net/gethelp/
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: [email protected]
> <[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]<[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]<[email protected]>
> Sent: Thu Feb 18 17:38:33 2010
> Subject: Re: [sipx-users] spa3102 for outbound calls
>
> Maybe something related to the 2 stage dialing config? I didn't notice any
> delays like this using the config I sent in that PDF but I was just thrilled
> it could make calls at all and might just not have noticed the delay. Maybe
> plug in a butt-set or a parallel phone and listen for where the delay is to
> narrow it down (delay seizing line, delay before dialing, delay or slow
> dialing of digits, ...?).
>
> -Eric
>
> On Feb 18, 2010, at 4:33 PM, [email protected] wrote:
>
>    
>> I have everything working except what I assume is a dialing rule problem.
>> As soon as I hit send on the Ploycom, I do see the call transferred to the
>> IP of the SPA.
>> If I have dialed a 11 digit number (1 + area code + xxx-xxxx) the call
>> rings immediately.
>> If I dial a 10 digit number (area code + xxx-xxxx) it starts ringing in
>> about 6 seconds.
>> If I dial a 7 digit number, the call doesn't start ringing for 10 seconds.
>> Nothing I have done with the dialing rule seems to change anything. I'm
>> assuming the PSTN Line is the place I need to change this. Interdigit
>> Short Timer defaults to 5 and Interdigit Short Timer: defaults to 10.
>> After reading what they do, I thought that had to be it for sure.
>> http://www.bhatt.id.au/blog/fix-sipura-voip-ata-adapter-interdigit-dialing-delay/
>> I tried lowering those. It didn't seem to affect anything. I'm assuming
>> that as soon as it shows the IP on the polycom, the call has been
>> transferred to the SPA, so the change I need to make would have to be in
>> the SPA. Any ideas?
>>
>> On 2/18/2010 11:55 AM, Eric Varsanyi wrote:
>>      
>>> I started with an Audiocodes gateway back in October, it was the one
>>> model (FXO+FXS) that sipxecs wouldn't configure and the sipxecs
>>> configuration stuff for FXO required it to be treated as a homogenous
>>> group of ports. Two things led me to return it:
>>>
>>>     1) The documentation and manual configuration of the SPA3102 is pretty
>>> good compared to Audiocodes  (there were numerous occasions when changing
>>> what appeared to be a completely unrelated setting resulted in no
>>> dialtone on the FXS side, I think they just internally bail if anything
>>> is amiss and give you no diagnostics).
>>>     2) On a brand new unit they wanted me to buy a service contract to get
>>> the current firmware and download the manuals (such as they are)
>>>
>>> The SPA may be a buggy POS but Audiocodes was at least as frustrating to
>>> configure and, as a bonus, it was expensive too.
>>>
>>> I expect someone using a model supported by sipXecs for configuration
>>> would have a better experience.
>>>
>>> I feel your pain, the SPA sure is a PITA to get going. Happy to help if I
>>> can, all those hours spent beating my head on the damn thing might as
>>> well go to some good :)
>>>
>>> -Eric Varsanyi
>>>
>>> On Feb 18, 2010, at 11:46 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>        
>>>> This ebay auction is starting to look tempting :)
>>>> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=350265531020&rvr_id=&crlp=1_263602_263622&UA=%3F*I7&GUID=d74220781250a0e203017dc1fbe784da&itemid=350265531020&ff4=263602_263622
>>>>
>>>> Audio Codes MP-114 FXO VOIP Gateway - NEW
>>>> US $249.99
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2/18/2010 11:17 AM, Eric Varsanyi wrote:
>>>>
>>>>          
>>>>> For debugging if you set it up to send syslog messages and turn the
>>>>> level all the way up it sometimes produces semi-useful output. You
>>>>> don't have to have a syslog server set up to catch it if you can run
>>>>> tcpdump or socat.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you can capture traffic to/from the device with tcpdump that's
>>>>> probably the next step if the syslog stuff doesn't pay off (it kind of
>>>>> sounds like either its ignoring you or sipxproxy isn't really sending
>>>>> the invite where you hope its going).
>>>>>
>>>>> -Eric Varsanyi
>>>>>
>>>>> On Feb 18, 2010, at 11:09 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>            
>>>>>> I have no doubt it is a PEBKAC, I just don't where to look. I changed
>>>>>> it to 5061 (I now see that setting in the PSTN Line tab on the
>>>>>> spa3102). The logs look about the same to me. I don't see anything
>>>>>> that even tells me it is making it to the spa3102.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 2/18/2010 10:54 AM, Eric Varsanyi wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>              
>>>>>>> When I set mine up late last year the only issue I had making
>>>>>>> outbound calls (that wasn't PEBKAC) was the thing didn't think there
>>>>>>> was a line attached and returned something like 'resource not
>>>>>>> avaiable' to the invite. I had to change the line voltage threshold
>>>>>>> down in the international settings box to fix this.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ah, in the log I see you're using 5060, the FXO side by default is on
>>>>>>> 5061 (the FXS is on 5060). LIkely that's your issue.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Eric
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Feb 18, 2010, at 10:42 AM, [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                
>>>>>>>> I'm trying to configure a spa3102 for outbound calls only. I know
>>>>>>>> people pull their hair out over these devices, but I wanted to give
>>>>>>>> it a shot. My only gateways I've worked with so far are sipxbridge
>>>>>>>> and an audiocodes configred from within sipx, so I haven't really
>>>>>>>> done too much manual FXO configuration.
>>>>>>>> I think I may be missing something on the sipx end, because I don't
>>>>>>>> think the call is ever making it to the spa3102. This is a new setup
>>>>>>>> and has no other gateways. I added the spa3102 as an unmanaged
>>>>>>>> gateway. I enabled all the dialing plans and added the gateway. I'm
>>>>>>>> using a polycom 550, Sipx 4.0.4,  bootrom 4.2.1, firmware 3.1.3C
>>>>>>>> split. I would show a siptrace, but the merged file doesn't really
>>>>>>>> have anything in it. The sipx server is at 10.81.1.5. The spa3102 is
>>>>>>>> at 10.81.1.6. I tried setting the gateway in sipx to UDP manually
>>>>>>>> (that is what the spa3102 defaults to) and specifying port 5060, but
>>>>>>>> that didn't seem to change anything. There are only 2 logs created,
>>>>>>>> so I attached those. Is there something simple I'm missing? I read
>>>>>>>> through this,
>>>>>>>> http://sipx-wiki.calivia.com/index.php/HowTo_configure_sipX_to_work_with_FXO/FXS_SIP_Gateways
>>>>>>>> but I don't see anything that sticks out at me. The only thig I
>>>>>>>> thought I might need to do is something in authrules.xml, but I'm
>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>>                  
>    not sure since the text around it refers to FXS and this is FXO. I sort of
> guess there has to be some some sort of authorization for the spa3102 to
> know the sipx call can be sent outbound, but I don't know where to do this.
> Sorry if I'm missing something obvious here. I think the fact that I got an
> audiocodes 8 port working inbound and outbound with no questions (and
> clearly not much knowledge on the subject) is a testament to how well sipx
> is able to configure it!
>    
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Matthew
>>>>>>>> <sipregistrar.log><sipXproxy.log>_______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
>>>>>>>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
>>>>>>>> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
>>>>>>>> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>                  
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>                
>>>>>> <sipregistrar.log><sipXproxy.log>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>              
>>>>>
>>>>>            
>>>>
>>>>          
>>>        
>>
>>      
> _______________________________________________
> sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
> Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
> sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/
>    

_______________________________________________
sipx-users mailing list [email protected]
List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users
Unsubscribe: http://list.sipfoundry.org/mailman/listinfo/sipx-users
sipXecs IP PBX -- http://www.sipfoundry.org/

Reply via email to