On 08/26/2010 12:13 AM, Martin Steinmann wrote: > I would put them into the category of 'closed' phones, meaning that > they are really not made with the intent to work on other systems than > Avaya's. Ain't that the truth.... > Therefore, taking all this and including support cost into account, > new phones might not be that bad an option. We started this 'pilot' with the Polycom 670 handset, which imho, is a superior product for this implementation. However, it would seem that those who make purchasing decisions are not the same folks as those who must configure the system...
On a positive note, my boss and I did figure out how to make the Avaya 9640s send a proper From header this morning. But, the Avaya 9640s choose not to read the proper From header, thus, no name info is displayed, still.
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
