On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 09:10:05 -0500, Tony Graziano wrote: > If it us stretched out its possible it got stuck in the sending machine.
I'm using fax.com as a test sender. It works as it should once it's processed. I'm suspecting that something isn't getting processed since the update. > On Jan 22, 2012 8:59 AM, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 05:53:52 -0500, Tony Graziano wrote: >> can you actually view the file: >> /tmp/fax_2012-01-21-10-15-16_5713645485369203406.tiff >> > Yup, it's the fax cover sheet I'm using for testing. It's stretched out but > it's intact. > > >> On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 12:46 AM, [email protected] <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> Thought I sent that but guess it didn't make it. >>> >>> On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 18:54:53 -0600, [email protected] wrote: >>>> On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 19:36:58 -0500, Tony Graziano wrote: >>>>> I m looking to see if the faxrx says it is starting, I am not >>>>> necessarily >>>>> looking for errors. >>>>> >>>> Well, we know it lands in the /tmp directory as a tiff but after >>>> that, I >>>> was hoping to find an error mentioning a missing tool, directory, >>>> something. I'll attach the file because I'm not sure what I'm looking >>>> for. >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> sipx-users mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sipx-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
