Maybe somebody who uses them should document it in the Wiki: http://wiki.sipfoundry.org/display/sipXecs/Telephony
Maybe it makes sense to create a 'Compatible ITSP's' page. Thanks, Mike On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:04 AM, [email protected] <[email protected]>wrote: > On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 08:58:51 -0500, Matt White wrote: > > Configure your firewall to port forward 5060 to 5080 for their IP block. > > Simple and effective for all features. > > I prefer not to get into that sort of thing if possible but yes, that was > the first option I was considering until they told me they could send to > 5080. It just got interesting since it's been over a week again after > having to wait over two weeks on some custom programming the first time I > wanted to test IP auth. > > > They dont know we have 15 Sipx accounts on their network because we > havent > > had a need to contact support. > > They didn't know my setup either until this came up. I simply asked for > test trunks, gave them some IP's to test from and asked if one of those > could be from port 5080. The others were port 5060. > > > But to answer your question directly, we find them reliable and easy to > > setup/work with. The only issue i have as a reseller is the helpdesk > > portal doesn't allow me to see multiple accounts at once. The helpdesk > > portal software needs an update badly. > > I am feeling good about them right now, even with the problems, especially > since you and others have confirmed reliability. Theirs is the fastest call > setup times I've seen so far, at least using the mediatrix so I'm happy > with that. > As for GUI, they have told me on more than one occasion now that they are > working hard on it and it's coming. > > Thanks for the input. > > Mike > > > > -m > > > >>>> "[email protected]" <[email protected]> 02/14/12 5:03 PM >>> > >> Sounds like you are trying to do IP auth? Have your sipx gateway > >> register with their server if they cannot send calls to 5080. > >> That is how we have it configured. > >> > > Correct, I need IP auth. That would work ok in some cases but IP auth > would > > be better. > > > > However, my main concern initially was wanting to ask others here if the > > company is reliable, worth waiting through all these problems for. I > badly > > need another ITSP so have been hoping they get this together. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > sipx-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > _______________________________________________ > sipx-users mailing list > [email protected] > List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ > -- Michael Picher, Director of Technical Services eZuce, Inc. 300 Brickstone Square**** Suite 201**** Andover, MA. 01810 O.978-296-1005 X2015 M.207-956-0262 @mpicher <http://twitter.com/mpicher> www.ezuce.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hope to see you at the sipX CoLab! http://www.sipfoundry.org/sipx-colab A gathering for - open source users, eZuce customers & eZuce partners Get the inside track on 4.6 and a glimpse at the future of sipXecs!
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
