After the SBC support (ACME) was exhausted after 2 complete days of working to handle the registration through the SBC as well as refer and Notify.. They finally gave up.. They asked us to check our SIPX configuration. What I did, I put the registration back directly on SIPX and everything worked just fine.. Yes, I tried both with and without a default SBC IP address / port 5060 without any difference. Regards Saad From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tony Graziano Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2012 3:10 PM To: [email protected]; Discussion list for users of sipXecs software Subject: Re: [sipx-users] Signaling issues on new install On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Joe Micciche <[email protected]> wrote: -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
> We are experiencing similar problems, started after the phone > registration were moved to an external SBC(ACME 3820),,,,,,,,,,,. > We were working on changing our deployment by updating our core > network design, just completed the change this morning, our call > flow became: Polycom >> SIPX>> SBC>> ITSP .. All Polycom > registration are done through the SBC.. Wouldn't your callflow actually be: Polycom -> [outside realm] sbc [inside realm] -> sipX -> [inside realm] sbc [outside realm] -> ITSP? Polycom [register>SBC>passthru to SIPX] ->sipxproxy to ->unamanaged gateway being sbc <-->> media to phone negotiated by sbc, sipx is not anchoring it. > 1. The MWI stopped to update itself. 2. The MOH has > also stopped to play . 3. The caller ID setting on the > "unmanaged Gateway" that is supposed to override the users CLID is > not taking in place and not working .. Also the CLID is showing the > extension number no matter what the setting was on the extension > caller ID settings. 4. The call forwarding is still OK ; > however, the attended AND Unattended transfer failed to work. All of this should Just Work, as others have noted it may require a slight tweak to your sbc config handling REFERs. We are experiencing #2 above, but our users like it as they hate hold music. Regardless, more details would be helpful. > Is there by chance a way to treat ACME 3820 as a "MANAGED" gateway? > Can we use ACME 1000 for it? Is the APKT set as your default sbc for internet calling? - -- ================================================================== Joe Micciche [email protected] Red Hat, Inc. http://www.redhat.com Senior Communications Engineer X (81) 44554 +1.919.754.4554 Key: 65F90FE1 ================================================================== -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk9iO/QACgkQJHjEUGX5D+HwtACeIuO/JyBb+CnirlqOiRjNYjju CPAAnj9eI2GLt+MOrKxcwzpTgso4KC6w =0mHm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/ -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Tony Graziano, Manager Telephone: 434.984.8430 sip: [email protected] Fax: 434.465.6833 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Linked-In Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/tony-graziano/14/4a6/7a4 Ask about our Internet Fax services! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ LAN/Telephony/Security and Control Systems Helpdesk: Telephone: 434.984.8426 sip: [email protected] Helpdesk Customers: http://myhelp.myitdepartment.net Blog: http://blog.myitdepartment.net
_______________________________________________ sipx-users mailing list [email protected] List Archive: http://list.sipfoundry.org/archive/sipx-users/
