On Thu, Mar 23, 2000 at 09:33:45AM +1100, Peter Vogel wrote: > Do you know if that would be wu-ftpd_2.6.0-1.rpm on my RH6.1 disks? > > If so, would it be okay to install that on a 5.2 system? > > If not, what's a better proposition, assuming I want to allow ftp? > > Is it all ftp that's a proble, or only anonymous? If you want an ultra-secure anonymous (only) ftp server, Dan Bernstein (of qmail fame) has written one. It doesn't allow _any_ external command execution, and doesn't need to, because it has cd and ls functions built in. -- Andrew -- SLUG - Sydney Linux Users Group Mailing List - http://www.slug.org.au To unsubscribe send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe in the text
- Re: [SLUG] Why doesn't FTP complete? Dave Fitch
- Re: [SLUG] Why doesn't FTP complete? chesty
- [SLUG] Notation question Peter Vogel
- Re: [SLUG] Notation question DaZZa
- Re: [SLUG] Notation question Andrew Reilly
- [SLUG] Next ftp question Peter Vogel
- Re: [SLUG] Next ftp question Howard Lowndes
- Re: [SLUG] Next ftp question Peter Vogel
- Re: [SLUG] Next ftp question Andrew Reilly
- Re: [SLUG] Next ftp questio... Matthew Dalton
- Re: [SLUG] Next ftp questio... Rachel Polanskis
- Re: [SLUG] Next ftp question Howard Lowndes
- Re: [SLUG] Next ftp questio... Matthew Dalton
- Re: [SLUG] Next ftp questio... Andrew Whyte
- Re: [SLUG] Next ftp questio... DaZZa
- Re: [SLUG] Next ftp questio... Kieran
- Re: [SLUG] Next ftp questio... Peter Vogel
- Re: [SLUG] Next ftp questio... Gordon Rowell
- Re: [SLUG] Next ftp questio... Charlie Brady
