Just wait a while if you use indoor instead of outdoor... moisture does wonders to small wires. And as far as shielded vs non-shielded, we have used both. Shielded has had fewer packet losses on long runs.. so we are sticking with it.
Scott -----Original Message----- From: Sevak Avakians <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: 24 Oct 2003 15:38:01 -0400 Subject: Re: [smartBridges] Outdoor Cat5 UV Cable > DOH! > > How much does it really matter in using outdoor CAT5 cable vs indoor > CAT5? Anyone getting by using indoor for outside? How about the > shielding? Anyone happy without shielding? Anyone like the shielding > better? Why? > > > On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 15:11, Scott wrote: > > > Words to live by. > > > > > > > It's tough to get through the compression fitting but > > > with a little vasoline it can be done. > > ----------ANNOUNCEMENT---------- > > Don't forget to register for WISPCON IV > > http://www.wispcon.info/us/wispcon-iv/wispcon-iv.htm > > > > The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List > > To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe > smartBridges <yournickname> > > To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe > smartBridges) > > Archives: http://archives.part-15.org > > > > > ----------ANNOUNCEMENT---------- Don't forget to register for WISPCON IV http://www.wispcon.info/us/wispcon-iv/wispcon-iv.htm The PART-15.ORG smartBridges Discussion List To Join: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type subscribe smartBridges <yournickname> To Remove: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (in the body type unsubscribe smartBridges) Archives: http://archives.part-15.org
