> On Jun 19, 2016, at 6:46 PM, Nigel W <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> On Sun, Jun 19, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Dale Ghent <[email protected]> wrote:
> One thing I'd like to see people who have ixgbe hardware (X550 and anything 
> else) is RSS. A good smoke test is to open up a high-traffic TCP stream 
> between the ixgbe box and another, with the ixgbe box being the receiver. A 
> tool for this is iperf.
> 
> In another window, watch interrupt count for ixgbe using 'intrstat 1' - you 
> should see a ton of interrupts from ixgbe landing on one particular CPU.
> 
> Then, open up a second (or third, or fourth) such stream and you should see 
> the interrupts for those land on a different CPU, as show with intrstat.
> 
> Since receive-side scaling was one of the major areas I had to re-work to 
> accommodate X550, this basic test would be a quick (albeit not exactly 
> scientific) way of making sure it's working as intended.
> 
> It does seem to be spreading, though not evenly or to all CPUs (4 of 8) but 
> that may be because I am only able to put 250 Mbit/s at it or because I am in 
> a zone

It's not meant to spread traffic evenly; it's meant to pin rx interrupts for *a 
specific* connection (hashed by source IP and source port) to a particular, 
single CPU. Zones have no bearing on this aspect. Why only 250Mb/s? Is this a 
local limitation of some sort?

/dale

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail




-------------------------------------------
smartos-discuss
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/184463/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/184463/25769125-55cfbc00
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=25769125&id_secret=25769125-7688e9fb
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to