On 2011-12-08 08:55, Aragon Gouveia<ara...@phat.za.net> wrote:
> On 12/07/11 23:00, Soren Kristensen wrote:
>> I don't have the knowledge to find out where and why FreeBSD stops, but
>> if some FreeBSD hacker can go down and tell me why, I will do what I can
>> do fix it if the BIOS need a little adjustment....
>
> Considering all the ACPI error messages, I guess it's a problem there
> somewhere.  The freebsd-acpi@ mailing list is a good place to seek ACPI
> wizards. :)

If I try to boot FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 in verbose mode with amd64 and i386 and 
compare the boot messages side-by-side, there are as many error messages 
about ACPI with the (successful) i386 boot than with the (failed) amd64 
boot.

The amd64 boot ends with the following lines:
 > panic: No usable event timer found!
 > cpuid = 0
 > KDB: stack backtrace:
 > #0 0xffffffff80867e4e at kdb_backtrace+0x5e
 > #1 0xffffffff80832ab7 at panic+0x187
 > #2 0xffffffff80b5250b at cpu_initclocks_bsp+0x3cb
 > #3 0xffffffff807e9ec0 at initclocks+0x20
 > #4 0xffffffff807e7507 at mi_startup+0x77
 > #5 0xffffffff8029f6ec at btext+0x2c
 > Uptime: 1s
 > Automatic reboot in 15 seconds - press a key on the console to abort

Whereas the i386 boot goes on at this same spot with:
 > lapic: Divisor 2, Frequency 50001280 Hz
 > Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec

Somehow, the "LAPIC" timer is reported with the i386 boot thus:
 > MPTable: <Soekris  net6501     >
 > Event timer "LAPIC" quality 400
 > FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor System Detected: 2 CPUs
 > FreeBSD/SMP: 1 package(s) x 1 core(s) x 2 HTT threads
 >  cpu0 (BSP): APIC ID:  0
 >  cpu1 (AP/HT): APIC ID:  1

but not on the amd64 boot.

Also, the i386 reports early on:
 > MP Configuration Table version 1.4 found at 0xc00fe110

and *not* the amd64 boot.

Anyway, just some preliminary information in case it triggers an Ah-ha! 
with some of the list members.

Cheers,

Denis F.
_______________________________________________
Soekris-tech mailing list
Soekris-tech@lists.soekris.com
http://lists.soekris.com/mailman/listinfo/soekris-tech

Reply via email to