On Montag 04 September 2006 01:26, Alasdair Campbell wrote:
> On 03/09/06, Marko Mäkelä <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2006 at 10:23:15AM +0100, Alasdair Campbell wrote:
> > > Here is a clip of the BBC rolling news channel, I can see LOTs of
> > > artifacts with the camera movements, and the scrolling text at the
> > > bottom looks poor:
> > >
> > > http://ginezbukov.com/artifacts.tar.bz2
> >
> > I don't know if your sample is still available, but I saw similar artifacts
> > (16:9 material vertically scaled on 4:3 screen on -vo dfb:mgatv) earlier
> > this week.  I made a short clip that contains some horizontal movement.
> 
> Clip is still available if anyone is interested in trying it out - BBC
> News 24 clip broadcast on UK DVB-T transmission.

Got it thanks, but I could not see artifacts and scrolling text looks
fine on my 4:3 TV (use directfb cvs from today with OSD issues).

> 
> > Are there any news on the DirectFB front?  I would appreciate an
> > interrupt-driven interface, to avoid burning CPU in the Flip() method.
> > Besides, the code from DirectFB CVS for better interlaced output broke
> > the OSD.  Has the situation improved since I last checked (June perhaps)?
> 
> I've been meaning to do more investigating on this, but things have
> been tough this past month and my girlfriend is certain that she likes
> vdr and that she doesn't want me messing about with it's inards!
> 
> I ended up using the Gentoo ebuilds to build my system from scratch
> because I thought make things easier for me. However they have been
> even less reliable than my own compiled setup so I'm going back to
> running CVS versions etc.
> 
> I'd like to investigate the output using "softdevice -vo dfb:" as I
> seem to rememebr that although the OSD was broken and there was a
> mirroring of picture above and below the 'letter box' there were no
> artifacts, and there was also an option to use the Fb-Intern(al)
> de-interlacer. Does that have anything to do with the matrox's
> Interlaced output(?).

The OSD is broken with DirectFB since field blit has been added to DirectFB-cvs.
I know this is very annoying. Currently I'm looking for that.

> 
> Some sort of reply from the softdevice programmers or any one from
> directFB would be useful in determining what could and couldn't work.
> 

-- 
Stefan Lucke
_______________________________________________
Softdevice-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/softdevice-devel

Reply via email to