*.. and these projects often die often because argument like this, which IMHO is a false dichotomy around core development vs the very nebulous "more SDK access". It ignores the fact that core development is done in a fraction of the time and benefit everyone plus the long term viability of the product, and don't necessarily exclude SDK support.*
It sounds to me to be always the same arguments at the end (front-end tools vs SDK extensibility). We are already capable of writing a custom exporter but suffer from inaccessible stuff. Why would I like the team to provide me an ascii file format while opening more the SDK would allow me to write my own + bring many other benefits in different areas other than IE? Following this idea, why did you guys exposed the ToolSDK and not just provided user-friendly tools once a year (...)? Considering the time it takes also to get updates or maintenance done on some parts of the software, I wouldn't like depending on the softimage team to see what I am looking for implemented. --jon 2013/1/28 Stefan Andersson <[email protected]> > Thanks Ivan! > > I really hope that this option will be available to us soon. And we can > see from the responses there are quite a few people who need it badly, and > have requested it for a long time. > > best regards > stefan andersson > > > > > On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 11:22 PM, ivan t <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi , >> >> This has been filed as SOFT-854 by Stefan Andersson. >> >> >> Thanks >> Ivan >> > > > > -- > *Stefan Andersson | Digital Janitor* > blog <http://sanders3d.wordpress.com> | showreel<http://vimeo.com/sanders3d>| > twitter <http://twitter.com/sanders3d> | > LinkedIn<http://www.linkedin.com/in/sanders3d>| cell: +46-73-6268850 | > skype:sanders3d > > >
