I bought the $450 version (XSI Foundation). It was a great bargain, but
looking back I can see now that the lack of ref models in that version was
pretty limiting and I could see why more experienced people would avoid it
just for that reason.

On a related note, I think it's a shame they stopped working on the Mod
Tools, that is what brought me over to Softimage in the first place.. it
really seemed like Softimage was the game-dev tool of choice back then.
While I'm still using it as my primary 3d tool, it's much harder to hang on
to that point of view these days.



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Angus Davidson
Sent: Sunday, April 07, 2013 12:01 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: This is what I meant by AE integration

not sure.. XSI was just 450$ for four years and people hesitated to get it
anyway. It should have taken the market by storm at that point.  I've got a
lot of opinions on all subjects -  :P -  but I'm really not sure why that
didn't happen.

Theres one very big difference between then and now . At the time that that
offer came out. The worlds economy was racing ahead. Money just wasnt so
much of an object as it is now. People bought Maya mostly because it was all
over magazines, websites etc. XSI was very rarely mentioned.

Now the worlds economy is mostly in the gutter so I can bet that if that a
similarly valued offer was given again with some decent marketing it would
be a very different story.= <table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0"
cellpadding="0" style="width:100%;"> <tr> <td align="left"
style="text-align:justify;"><font face="arial,sans-serif" size="1"
color="#999999"><span style="font-size:11px;">This communication is intended
for the addressee only. It is confidential. If you have received this
communication in error, please notify us immediately and destroy the
original message. You may not copy or disseminate this communication without
the permission of the University. Only authorised signatories are competent
to enter into agreements on behalf of the University and recipients are thus
advised that the content of this message may not be legally binding on the
University and may contain the personal views and opinions of the author,
which are not necessarily the views and opinions of The University of the
Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. All agreements between the University and
outsiders are subject to South African Law unless the University agrees in
writing to the contrary. </span></font></td> </tr> </table


Reply via email to