It's funny looking at these sorts of thread, I've seen them on and off for
years now.

Way I see it, as long as AD can make money from a product they don't spend
much on, don't really have to care about, and doesn't really threaten their
big sellers, why not keep it going?

Is Softimage ever going to get developed hugely from here on in? Nope. But
it's doing a pretty good job as is so I can see the next few years being
the same as the last. Minor improvements, bugs getting fixed, etc.

Once it stops making money for AD, they'll shut it down.




On 3 January 2014 09:49, Manuel Huertas Marchena <[email protected]>wrote:

> "I'm just thinking what if Avid or MS buy back SI if AD really abandon SI."
>
> mm...I don't think autodesk wants to sell a product just for someone else
> to revamp it and sell it as a concurrent to 3ds and maya...
>  if they were ever to abandon soft, they might just keep it to
> themselves...
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 11:42:58 +1300
>
> Subject: Re: rumor, Soft dead within the next year
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
>
>
> I'm just thinking what if Avid or MS buy back SI if AD really abandon SI.
> I like SI when Avid and MS had it... Old good memory.
>
> Daniel
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> Daniel Kim
> Animation Director & Professional 3D Generalist
> http://www.danielkim3d.com
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 11:34 AM, [email protected] 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>   So when softimage is "dead"(I hate this thread) what do you think?All
> softimage-user/Companys will switch then to another Software immediately?
>  I think the will stay for 2-4years and then switch to another
> Applikation.
>  And AD will get no money
>  Hahh haha, i think AD has no change to bury SI,maybe they will Sell it,
> and this means :rebirth !!!
>
>  happy New year!
>  And please cloth this thread .
>
>  Sorry fort my englisch
>
>  Walt
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to