Yeah Emilio ! definitely starting to look interesting
On 16 February 2014 22:40, Emilio Hernandez <[email protected]> wrote: > Latest release of redshift with hair. > > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/49626349/hair_01.jpg > > > > > 2014-02-16 15:24 GMT-06:00 Emilio Hernandez <[email protected]>: > >> Redshift has hair now! >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 2014-01-10 1:10 GMT-06:00 Mirko Jankovic <[email protected]>: >> >> just played a bit with overclocking... >>> now I pushed PCI GEN in bios back to auto instead of GEN 3 so it is now >>> PCI 2.0 x16 instead of 3.. >>> That alone gave me slightly higher score on cinebench.. and after >>> overclocking CPU to 4.5 now new result in cinebench for titan is 100, and >>> script in softimage gives me ~200 fps. >>> Oh well... >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:24 PM, Mirko Jankovic < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> yes fps is score. hmm maybe if I got some time I could get one of >>>> titans and test it out on maximus MBO to see if that is the diference... >>>> >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 8:09 PM, Emilio Hernandez <[email protected]>wrote: >>>> >>>>> Dumb question here. Where do I see the score? I only get a fps result >>>>> for OpenGl and a 759cb in the CPU results in Cinebench. >>>>> >>>>> and I get 75.78fps at the OpenGl test. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2014/1/9 Mirko Jankovic <[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>>> cinebench you mean? so what is score? :) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Emilio Hernandez >>>>>> <[email protected]>wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Now I am starting to scratch my head to figure out the maze of >>>>>>> Nvidia... >>>>>>> >>>>>>> At least my benchmark said the Titatn beated up a Quadro 4000K.... >>>>>>> ha ha >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 2014/1/9 Mirko Jankovic <[email protected]> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> getting around 95 score in cinebench with titan, and again 780 in >>>>>>>> home comp getting 140 score in cinebench... >>>>>>>> wondering how can 780 crash titan so much in opengl. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> titan system beside 4 titans have i7 3930K, asus p9x79-e ws MBO >>>>>>>> and home comp i7 4770k on asus maximus VI hero >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Will test some redshift rendering later to compare single GPU 780 >>>>>>>> vs titan >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 7:11 PM, Emilio Hernandez <[email protected] >>>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yes specailly if you are getting more than the double speed. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I ran the test and I got 75.78 fps >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Thx >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> 2014/1/9 Mirko Jankovic <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> yea I guess that woul dbe the case but just tried.. strange >>>>>>>>>> really no idea.. any chance to run cinebench 15 opengl test then? if >>>>>>>>>> that >>>>>>>>>> gives too low result as well then something is not good >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 6:58 PM, Emilio Hernandez < >>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It is set to ALL. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> 2014/1/9 Mirko Jankovic <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> hmm another gues.. is it set to RT or ALL in play? >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 6:53 PM, Emilio Hernandez < >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I already did that and still getting the 65 fps limit with the >>>>>>>>>>>>> Titan. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2014/1/9 Mirko Jankovic <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> just got back , yes 60 is vsync on, turn of vsync in nvida >>>>>>>>>>>>>> control panel >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 5:52 PM, Stefan Kubicek < >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess 60fps is the refresh rate of your display, right? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you disabled VSync in the driver settings? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I just get "60.0 fps +" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How are you getting it display a value higher than 60? I'm >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pretty sure it the actual fps is higher, but the value in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> viewport is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> capped at 60.... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Tim >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/9/2014 10:12 AM, Leonard Koch wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I get about 28-31 out of my 680. Does anyone have a common >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> explanation for that? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Emilio Hernandez < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Mirko I ran your script and I got 50.7 fps... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But then I remembered I have my displays plugged in to my >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 470.. hahaha. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Don't ask why, but when using AE with the displays plugged >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into the Ti, AE does not like it and disables GPU for >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> calculations... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Pffff. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2014/1/9 Mirko Jankovic <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey Tim >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Would you be able to take 2 minutes of your tmie and run >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this ol python script for SI with your titan? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm getting weird results with an 780 in my home system >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> outperforming titan a lot... well here is copy paste from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> forum if you are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> able to check it out as well.. thanks!: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> itan: ~170 fps >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 780: ~245 fps >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Go figure [image: :)] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But I'm suspecting something weird with my titan system >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for some time will have to test further but would be great if >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> anyone with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> titan as well could run it too? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This old python script: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Application.CreatePrim("Cube", "MeshSurface", "", "") >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Application.SetValue("cube.polymsh.geom.subdivu", 831, "") >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Application.SetValue("cube.polymsh.geom.subdivv", 800, "") >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Application.SetValue("cube.polymsh.geom.subdivbase", 800, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "") >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Application.SetValue("Camera.camvis.refreshrate", True, "") >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Application.SetDisplayMode("Camera", "shaded") >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Application.DeselectAll() >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Application.SetValue("PlayControl.Out", 5000, "") >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Application.DeselectAll() >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Application.GetPrim("Null", "", "", "") >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Application.SelectObj("Camera_Root", "", "") >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Application.CopyPaste("Camera_Root", "", "null", 1) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Application.SelectObj("null", "", "") >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Application.SaveKey("null.kine.local.rotx,null.kine.local.roty,null.kine.local.rotz", >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1, "", "", "", "", "") >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Application.SetValue("PlayControl.Key", 5000, "") >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Application.SetValue("PlayControl.Current", 5000, "") >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Application.Rotate("", 0, 8000, 0, "siAbsolute", >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "siPivot", "siObj", "siY", "", "", "", "", "", "", "", 0, "") >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Application.SaveKey("null.kine.local.rotx,null.kine.local.roty,null.kine.local.rotz", >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5000, "", "", "", "", "") >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Application.FirstFrame() >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just paste in python script run and hit play. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thakns! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 3:34 PM, Tim Crowson < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We've been testing 1 Titan vs. 3 and so far, the speed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> increase of the triple-Titan box is holding at about 2.45x. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In an email >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exchange (or maybe it was on the forums, can't recall) it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was mentioned >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that on the topic parallelization, Pixar had determined that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> even for them, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4 units together (of whatever, not necessarily Titans) was >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the max they >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> could really go before it started to cost more money than it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was worth. In >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> our case, I'm thinking 3 might be our max, based on some >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> nerdy mathematics >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> by one of our IT guys analyzing render times per shot, per >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> frame, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hardware/software costs, rack space used, etc. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But hey, Redshift aside, the Titan in my workstation is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doing wonders for my viewport performance in Soft. I had a >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 58M, 2500-item >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> model derived from a CAD file the other day, and this thing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> was letting me >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tumble around it at ~15fps in Shaded mode. That ain't shabby! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Tim >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 1/9/2014 6:11 AM, Paul Griswold wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There was a discussion on the RS forums about it. I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't recall the numbers, though. I don't think the speed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the PCIe slot >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> made a huge difference. It's really all about the speed of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the card. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also, although it doesn't load the entire scene into >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your card's memory, the more memory your card has, the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> better it is. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But overall, for the type of work I'm mainly doing >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> these days, it's extremely fast. In fact, it's so fast that >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was finding >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the bottleneck was the time taken to export the mesh to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Redshift, not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rendering. Redshift has a proxy system like Vray & Arnold, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but you have to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> manually create proxies per object & my scene had hundreds >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and hundreds of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> objects, so I didn't have time to create them. Therefore, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it was creating >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a renderable mesh per frame - so on a frame that took 28 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seconds to render, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 20 seconds was spent exporting the mesh and 8 seconds were >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spent on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> rendering. But again, it's a beta and they're continuing to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> improve things >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like the proxy system. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Once I'm caught up I'm hoping to try rendering the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> classroom scene and see how it does. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Paul >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ᐧ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stefan Kubicek >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> keyvis digital imagery >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alfred Feierfeilstraße 3 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A-2380 Perchtoldsdorf bei Wien >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Phone: +43/699/12614231 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.keyvis.at [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- This email and its attachments are -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --confidential and for the recipient only-- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
