For those of that don't know the notion of the within the quarter rule we can only speak about news that will happen within each quarter. A quarter is the 90 day period and we just had one starting on February 1st. If you talk about future things and someone buy's your software based on things you don't deliver in that period you can can't say you made that money in that 90 day period.
I know it sounds like a cop out but Avid was just delisted from the NASDAQ because they could not follow those rules http://www.forbes.com/sites/bobbyowsinski/2014/02/27/major-changes-around-the-corner-for-music-as-avid-delists/ . So that usually means future looking stuff for Maya is discussed on the beta boards whereas the public stuff is usually about just using Maya. I am really interested to hear about how the group wants to split the conversation but not the community. For those that have not got it the way to get a view of what we are doing in Maya to make it more palatable to soft users and a viable alternative is to send me a private email. I am way behind on catching up on them but I will start this week. The goal is to help everyone who wants to understand their options all the information you need to move forward. There are also people on here with large facilities, small boutiques, and individual freelancers, students, and teachers. Before the announce we did trips to Tokyo, Sydney, Paris, London, Frankfurt, New York, and Los Angeles. We also spent time with several Montreal soft houses. We will do some web meetings for a while and then in a month or two hit out again with training and onsite help. cv/ ________________________________ From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on behalf of Raffaele Fragapane [[email protected]] Sent: Monday, March 10, 2014 7:53 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: Migrate Ice In some regards things have to be private, Chris. Beside the over-abused "within quarter" rule for traded companies it's extremely hard to juggle a public discussion, and the sheer amount of noise and crusading isn't exactly encouraging anybody on either side to be too public. Just be one of the many that is getting in touch if you want to be part of it. Public with AD has never meant much. I agree in principle it will be nice, but it just doesn't seem to be how it works out for a mix of factors both internal and external to it. On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 9:41 PM, Chris Marshall <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: But actually nothing should be private, to be honest. We are all in the same effin boat here and should all be given all the information that's needed to help us out. Just because some shout louder than others, we are ALL screwed by the decision to scrap Softimage so this process should be all inclusive.
<<attachment: winmail.dat>>
