For my money, 2 780ti's is a better bet than 1 Titan.  But a Titan is
around $1k and a 780ti is $730.

Though they should be releasing more Maxwell based architecture soon,
right?   The GTX 750 is the first Maxwell card.


On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 1:35 PM, Leoung O'Young <[email protected]>wrote:

>  I have 4 workstations that I can put a titan in but not sure about
> multiple titans since the power supply supply and the motherboard may not
> handle it.
> The titan is twice the price of a 770/780, is it better to have 1 titan or
> 2x770/780? Sorry if this have been asked before.
>
>
> On 23/03/2014 1:08 PM, Paul Griswold wrote:
>
>  The performance isn't a 1:1 gain, but it's still better to have
> multi-GPUs than not since licensing isn't based on the number of GPUs, but
> on the number of physical machines.  It's much more cost-effective to put 4
> GPUs in a single machine than spend the money on 4 machines with a single
> GPU per machine.
>
>  -Paul
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Leoung O'Young <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> We are interested in Redshift too, just wondering what is the performance
>> different between having 2 titan in one machine vs 2 machines with 1 titan
>> each?
>>
>>
>>
>> On 23/03/2014 12:05 AM, Ed Manning wrote:
>>
>>> On the economic advantages of redshift or other gpu renderers.
>>>
>>> My current workstations are Mac Pro 3.1s which are left over from the
>>> company I shut down in 2009 (bootcamped  into Windows).  Essentially
>>> worthless from a CPU standpoint. Putting a single $1000 titan gpu into one
>>> of them makes it more efficient at rendering than any modern 16-core $8,000
>>> workstation running any CPU ray tracer. Putting 2 titans in them is like
>>> having my old 162-core blade server renderfarm without the $5000/month
>>> electric bill. Not to mention all the IT overhead and license costs.
>>>
>>> I have never seen a single piece of software (in concert with the
>>> astonishing graphics hardware that is now so cheap and still getting
>>> cheaper) have such a cost-reducing impact.
>>>
>>> Plus they are fanatically hard workers and great communicators.
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

Reply via email to