if anything it shows that bridges between software can be made and that there is added value in combining platforms.
as opposed to ditching them. now imagine one vendor having both the 3d applications and the procedural environment under its own roof, with access to the development teams and source code. making such a bridge should be much easier. but that would require some forward thinking. this spring it’s getting obviously clear at which companies the forward thinking is / is not happening. From: Eugen Sares Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 10:59 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Houdini Engine for Cinema4D Cross-posting from si-community: http://www..maxon.net/en/news/press-releases/singleview/article/maxon-announces-partnership-with-side-effects-software.html http://www.sidefx.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2720&Itemid=66 Sounds pretty cool! C4D could use more proceduralism, and extra tools. Is it becoming a real Softimage alternative by this? Besides, did anyone happen to attend the Maxon presentation on FMX yesterday? -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Diese E-Mail ist frei von Viren und Malware, denn der avast! Antivirus Schutz ist aktiv.
