This is all starting to resemble Game of Thrones.
On 23 April 2014 14:36, Luc-Eric Rousseau <luceri...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Sounds pretty cool! C4D could use more proceduralism, and extra tools. > > Is it becoming a real Softimage alternative by this? > > I'm willing to be that if you had it, you'd never use Houdini Engine > in Cinema 4D. This doesn't give you any procedural authoring in C4D, > just the ability to run an asset that was authored in Houdini, > typically with a simple PPG of settings. > > As a freelancer looking for an alternative to ICE, it would quite a > waste of time to author the graph in houdini and do all the work to > package it up to run it in C4D. In real life, you'd probably just do > it all on the houdini side and cache out or render there. Or more > realistically, if you spent that much time in C4D that this would be > hugely important, you'd likely do everything there except for the > occasional case when you can't.. and then you probably would not have > had spent enough time with Houdini to be at ease with it to solve the > problem there efficiently. You'd probably end up doing the particles > in C4D's thinking particle instead. > > On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:59 AM, Eugen Sares <sof...@mail.sprit.org> > wrote: > > > > Cross-posting from si-community: > > http://www.. > maxon.net/en/news/press-releases/singleview/article/maxon-announces-partnership-with-side-effects-software.html > > > http://www.sidefx.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2720&Itemid=66 > > > > Sounds pretty cool! C4D could use more proceduralism, and extra tools. > > Is it becoming a real Softimage alternative by this? > > > > Besides, did anyone happen to attend the Maxon presentation on FMX > yesterday? > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > Diese E-Mail ist frei von Viren und Malware, denn der avast! Antivirus > Schutz ist aktiv. > > > > >
