Well mostly to add in the more up to date features, like proper 3d Integration, 
 It needed a lot more optimisation as it bogs down on longer more complex 
sequences. For student work it was great. Us not being able to use Softimage 
next year , means we will have to move to Nuke / Blender or Fusion next year.


________________________________________
From: Matt Lind [[email protected]]
Sent: 19 December 2014 09:32 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Lets Hope Autodesk Buys the Foundry!

In your opinion, what would've needed to happen with the FXTree to make it a
'real contender'.

Matt




Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 07:23:40 +0000
From: Angus Davidson <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Lets Hope Autodesk Buys the Foundry!
To: "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Well Fusion in the hands of Blackmagic is a start.

One of the biggest travesties in Soft is how they left Illusion to stagnate
and die. With a bit of effort it could have been a real contender. As it is
its still used for quick comps even today. For something last worked on a
long time ago thats impressive.

Then again the compositor in blender is shaping up to be very useable. So
there are very viable alternatives to Nuke.

=
<table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" 
style="width:100%;"> 
<tr>
<td align="left" style="text-align:justify;"><font face="arial,sans-serif" 
size="1" color="#999999"><span style="font-size:11px;">This communication is 
intended for the addressee only. It is confidential. If you have received this 
communication in error, please notify us immediately and destroy the original 
message. You may not copy or disseminate this communication without the 
permission of the University. Only authorised signatories are competent to 
enter into agreements on behalf of the University and recipients are thus 
advised that the content of this message may not be legally binding on the 
University and may contain the personal views and opinions of the author, which 
are not necessarily the views and opinions of The University of the 
Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. All agreements between the University and 
outsiders are subject to South African Law unless the University agrees in 
writing to the contrary. </span></font></td>
</tr>
</table>


Reply via email to