Re: Lets Hope Autodesk Buys the Foundry!

Fri, 19 Dec 2014 04:52:55 -0800

there is also this..
http://flowbox.io/flowbox-features/

looks new and original,
everything looks (almost too) good but curious to know the pros and cons,


On 12/19/14 5:59, Paulo Cesar Duarte wrote:
I see that no one mentioned Natron, is an open source compositor, very similar to Nuke, came out the first version this year, it doesn't have 3d environment yet, but it's very promising, I'm using at work, you can use the same plugins available currently for Nuke.

Natron:



2014-12-19 6:22 GMT-02:00 Angus Davidson <[email protected]>:
Well mostly to add in the more up to date features, like proper 3d Integration,  It needed a lot more optimisation as it bogs down on longer more complex sequences. For student work it was great. Us not being able to use Softimage next year , means we will have to move to Nuke / Blender or Fusion next year.


________________________________________
From: Matt Lind [[email protected]]
Sent: 19 December 2014 09:32 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Lets Hope Autodesk Buys the Foundry!

In your opinion, what would've needed to happen with the FXTree to make it a
'real contender'.

Matt




Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 07:23:40 +0000
From: Angus Davidson <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: Lets Hope Autodesk Buys the Foundry!
To: "[email protected]"
<[email protected]>
Message-ID:
<[email protected]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Well Fusion in the hands of Blackmagic is a start.

One of the biggest travesties in Soft is how they left Illusion to stagnate
and die. With a bit of effort it could have been a real contender. As it is
its still used for quick comps even today. For something last worked on a
long time ago thats impressive.

Then again the compositor in blender is shaping up to be very useable. So
there are very viable alternatives to Nuke.

=
<table width="100%" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" style="width:100%;">
<tr>
<td align="left" style="text-align:justify;"><font face="arial,sans-serif" size="1" color="#999999"><span style="font-size:11px;">This communication is intended for the addressee only. It is confidential. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately and destroy the original message. You may not copy or disseminate this communication without the permission of the University. Only authorised signatories are competent to enter into agreements on behalf of the University and recipients are thus advised that the content of this message may not be legally binding on the University and may contain the personal views and opinions of the author, which are not necessarily the views and opinions of The University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg. All agreements between the University and outsiders are subject to South African Law unless the University agrees in writing to the contrary. </span></font></td>
</tr>
</table>




--

Reply via email to