Lol Paul :), we put nodes in your nodes so you can node while you node ! On 19 December 2014 at 16:49, Dan Yargici <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks. > > DAN > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Paul Doyle <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I'm not familiar with their tech, but I'd say that visual programming >> systems aren't anything special or original these days (or shouldn't be >> seen that way). The issues always comes down to flexibility and performance >> - is it as fast as writing native code, and can I add/edit nodes easily, >> and are those nodes as performant as what comes out of the box. The more >> you go towards providing complete workflows, the harder that gets imo. >> >> I'd say they seem to be covering an awful lot of bases. Good luck to them >> if they pull it off - we can always Splice into it ;) >> >> On 19 December 2014 at 10:23, Dan Yargici <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Indeed, that's what I was thinking also... I'd be interested to hear >>> what Paul makes of it. >>> >>> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Marc-Andre Carbonneau < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hmmm the idea sounds familiar to what Fabric is building, no? >>>> >>>> Interesting times. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto: >>>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jason S >>>> *Sent:* December-19-14 7:52 AM >>>> *To:* [email protected] >>>> *Subject:* Re: Lets Hope Autodesk Buys the Foundry! >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> there is also this.. >>>> http://flowbox.io/flowbox-features/ >>>> >>>> looks new and original, >>>> everything looks (almost too) good but curious to know the pros and >>>> cons, >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>
