I'm not familiar with their tech, but I'd say that visual programming systems aren't anything special or original these days (or shouldn't be seen that way). The issues always comes down to flexibility and performance - is it as fast as writing native code, and can I add/edit nodes easily, and are those nodes as performant as what comes out of the box. The more you go towards providing complete workflows, the harder that gets imo.
I'd say they seem to be covering an awful lot of bases. Good luck to them if they pull it off - we can always Splice into it ;) On 19 December 2014 at 10:23, Dan Yargici <[email protected]> wrote: > Indeed, that's what I was thinking also... I'd be interested to hear what > Paul makes of it. > > On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Marc-Andre Carbonneau < > [email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hmmm the idea sounds familiar to what Fabric is building, no? >> >> Interesting times. >> >> >> >> *From:* [email protected] [mailto: >> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jason S >> *Sent:* December-19-14 7:52 AM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: Lets Hope Autodesk Buys the Foundry! >> >> >> >> there is also this.. >> http://flowbox.io/flowbox-features/ >> >> looks new and original, >> everything looks (almost too) good but curious to know the pros and cons, >> >> >> >> >
