Thanks. DAN
On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 5:51 PM, Paul Doyle <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm not familiar with their tech, but I'd say that visual programming > systems aren't anything special or original these days (or shouldn't be > seen that way). The issues always comes down to flexibility and performance > - is it as fast as writing native code, and can I add/edit nodes easily, > and are those nodes as performant as what comes out of the box. The more > you go towards providing complete workflows, the harder that gets imo. > > I'd say they seem to be covering an awful lot of bases. Good luck to them > if they pull it off - we can always Splice into it ;) > > On 19 December 2014 at 10:23, Dan Yargici <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Indeed, that's what I was thinking also... I'd be interested to hear >> what Paul makes of it. >> >> On Fri, Dec 19, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Marc-Andre Carbonneau < >> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hmmm the idea sounds familiar to what Fabric is building, no? >>> >>> Interesting times. >>> >>> >>> >>> *From:* [email protected] [mailto: >>> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jason S >>> *Sent:* December-19-14 7:52 AM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* Re: Lets Hope Autodesk Buys the Foundry! >>> >>> >>> >>> there is also this.. >>> http://flowbox.io/flowbox-features/ >>> >>> looks new and original, >>> everything looks (almost too) good but curious to know the pros and cons, >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >
