Should have been 'Render Schematic View" ;-P
Rob
\/-------------\/----------------\/
On 17-2-2015 19:10, Simon Reeves wrote:
"render tree" isn't the best!
Simon Reeves
London, UK
/[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>/
/www.simonreeves.com <http://www.simonreeves.com>/
/www.analogstudio.co.uk <http://www.analogstudio.co.uk>//
/
On 17 February 2015 at 17:21, Greg Punchatz <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
and in Maya's defense Soft got a lot of names goofy too...
Envelopes should be called skinning
Thats about the nicest thing I have to say about maya at this point ;)
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:29 AM, Robert Cole
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
Whoa!
The Hypershade.. it s'posed to be a Render Tree, not as good,
or as functional, and the name sounded really cool in
school... still not sure what's so "hyper" about it.. 'cept it
gets me Hyper that's for sure.
-R
On 2/17/2015 11:16 AM, john clausing wrote:
DAG or "directed acyclic graph".....what they mean is object
hierarchy
Hypershade......what they mean is material editor
Hypergraph......what they mean is schematic
Graph Editor.....what they mean is animation editor
Visor....still no idea
Group.....what they mean is "null" sorta, but it's called
"null" in the outliner even though they call it
"group"...wait....what?
Set.....what they mean is "group"
c'mon....aren't we past calling things "nerdy" names cause
they're cool?
thus endeth my rant....sorry.
john
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com>
Version: 2015.0.5646 / Virus Database: 4284/9129 - Release Date: 02/17/15
