I guess this has a lot to do with how you use it and your methodology. While not crash free I have always found Softimage very stable for these things, except for a couple of versions along the way that made me pull hair out, but even on those occasions you learn how to workaround and avoid losing work.
So while not solid all way around, I would say pretty damnn stable for me, especially on certain "golden" versions. Morten > Den 8. december 2016 klokken 22:52 skrev Andy Chlupka > <lists.andy.goeh...@gmail.com>: > > > > > On Dec 08, 2016, at 19:20, Pierre Schiller <activemotionpictu...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > SI only needed 1 or 2 SP at most, each year. Solid code only needs > > upgrades, not bug-patching service packs. > > Are you serious? You are kidding right? Softimage is not a solid piece of > software all around. In my field of work assembly, shading, lighting and > rendering, I’ve lost countless hours of productivity. You know what made my > work fun and enjoyable again? Using a software that doesn’t crash during > those tasks. > > My comfort zone in Softimage was minimized due to it being crashy for what I > had to use it for. As for our animators and modelers, they’re just still too > comfortable with Soft to have an incentive to move to another application. > > We’ve checked our crash logs according to this: > https://xsisupport.com/tag/crashes-2/ <https://xsisupport.com/tag/crashes-2/> > and the number of clean exits we’re crushed by the others. > > Andy------ > Softimage Mailing List. > To unsubscribe, send a mail to softimage-requ...@listproc.autodesk.com with > "unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm. ------ Softimage Mailing List. To unsubscribe, send a mail to softimage-requ...@listproc.autodesk.com with "unsubscribe" in the subject, and reply to confirm.
