No Everything is fine with 2.4. I just find a better way to implement it so that it is easier for users to change the frequency set. 73, Tom KM5H
--- On Fri, 6/6/08, Jose Bonanca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: From: Jose Bonanca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [softrock40] Re: Xtall Software V2.4 - SI570 Registers? To: [email protected] Date: Friday, June 6, 2008, 8:16 AM Tom are you telling us that the frequencies are not correct in version 2.4? 73 On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Tom Hoflich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Yes, 1111 is at hex 60. There has been a list of frequencies and offsets for 2.4 and 2.5 for a while in the XTALL daughter board folder called XTALL frequency lists.xls You do have to work a little to get the 2.4 offsets, however. 73, Tom KM5H --- On Thu, 6/5/08, dick_faust <[EMAIL PROTECTED] com> wrote: From: dick_faust <[EMAIL PROTECTED] com> Subject: [softrock40] Re: Xtall Software V2.4 - SI570 Registers? To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com Date: Thursday, June 5, 2008, 8:07 PM Tom, Thanks for the clearifications. > Location 0 in the eeprom is the 6 registers that are read from the Si570 > Location 6 in the eeprom is the 6 registers for switch setting 0000. > Location C hex is the 6 registers for switch setting 0001 and so on. > Does the last location [switch setting #15 {1111}] start at 0x60 ? Just a check on my math. Is there a place to change the I2C address ? I will still make a spreadsheet for the memory map for v2.4 so each location is clear. Could make one for v2.4+ too if it is just a shift of 6 places. Thanks, 73, Dick K9IVB -- Jose Bonanca (CT1aos)
