Fine Thanks.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 2:22 PM, Tom Hoflich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No > > Everything is fine with 2.4. I just find a better way to implement it so > that it is easier for users to change the frequency set. > > > > 73, Tom KM5H > > --- On *Fri, 6/6/08, Jose Bonanca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>* wrote: > > From: Jose Bonanca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [softrock40] Re: Xtall Software V2.4 - SI570 Registers? > To: [email protected] > Date: Friday, June 6, 2008, 8:16 AM > > Tom are you telling us that the frequencies are not correct in version > 2.4? > 73 > > > > On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 1:57 PM, Tom Hoflich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Yes, 1111 is at hex 60. >> >> There has been a list of frequencies and offsets for 2.4 and 2.5 for a >> while in the XTALL daughter board folder called XTALL frequency lists.xls >> >> >> >> You do have to work a little to get the 2.4 offsets, however. >> >> >> >> 73, Tom KM5H >> >> >> >> --- On *Thu, 6/5/08, dick_faust <[EMAIL PROTECTED] com<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >* wrote: >> >> From: dick_faust <[EMAIL PROTECTED] com <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> >> Subject: [softrock40] Re: Xtall Software V2.4 - SI570 Registers? >> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ups.com <[email protected]> >> Date: Thursday, June 5, 2008, 8:07 PM >> >> Tom, >> Thanks for the clearifications. >> > Location 0 in the eeprom is the 6 registers that are read from the >> Si570 >> > Location 6 in the eeprom is the 6 registers for switch setting 0000. >> > Location C hex is the 6 registers for switch setting 0001 and so on. >> > >> Does the last location [switch setting #15 {1111}] start at 0x60 ? Just >> a check on my math. >> >> Is there a place to change the I2C address ? >> >> I will still make a spreadsheet for the memory map for v2.4 so each >> location is clear. Could make one for v2.4+ too if it is just a shift >> of 6 places. >> >> Thanks, >> 73, Dick K9IVB >> >> > > > -- > Jose Bonanca (CT1aos) > > > -- Jose Bonanca (CT1aos)
