Hi Hemant, As I know, since 6rd BRs are stateless, so you can configure an anycast address for load balancing stuff.
Thanks, washam 2010/10/13 Hemant Singh (shemant) <shem...@cisco.com>: > A general question. If 6rd could become an RFC in RFC 5969 with no > mention of FQDN for the BR, what is so special about DS-Lite and > deployments that a FQDN is needed by DS-Lite for the AFTR? I would > think the same FQDN issue would arise in 6rd as well... What did I miss? > > Thanks, > > Hemant > > -----Original Message----- > From: softwires-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:softwires-boun...@ietf.org] On > Behalf Of mohamed.boucad...@orange-ftgroup.com > Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 1:42 AM > To: Ralph Droms; > draft-ietf-softwire-ds-lite-tunnel-opt...@tools.ietf.org > Cc: Ullio Mario; Chairs Dhc; magli...@core3.amsl.com; Softwire Chairs; > Softwires > Subject: Re: [Softwires] DHCPv6 AFTR name option is needed > > Dear Raplh, > > Do you suggest the I-D should elaborate further on the FQDN use cases so > this to be acceptable by the IESG? > > Chairs, how should we proceed? The version which passed the WG LC is not > the 05. > > Cheers, > Med > > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > Softwires@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list Softwires@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
