Hi Hemant, As I know, since 6rd BRs are stateless, so you can configure an anycast address for load balancing stuff.
Thanks, washam 2010/10/13 Hemant Singh (shemant) <[email protected]>: > A general question. If 6rd could become an RFC in RFC 5969 with no > mention of FQDN for the BR, what is so special about DS-Lite and > deployments that a FQDN is needed by DS-Lite for the AFTR? I would > think the same FQDN issue would arise in 6rd as well... What did I miss? > > Thanks, > > Hemant > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of [email protected] > Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2010 1:42 AM > To: Ralph Droms; > [email protected] > Cc: Ullio Mario; Chairs Dhc; [email protected]; Softwire Chairs; > Softwires > Subject: Re: [Softwires] DHCPv6 AFTR name option is needed > > Dear Raplh, > > Do you suggest the I-D should elaborate further on the FQDN use cases so > this to be acceptable by the IESG? > > Chairs, how should we proceed? The version which passed the WG LC is not > the 05. > > Cheers, > Med > > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
