The fundamental issue is total cost to the operator. Different operators
have different cost structures, hence need different engineering
solutions. This isn't a matter of using precise language -- "stateless"
is a term of convenience fitting the perceptions of the particular group
of persons interested in the MAP and 4rd work.
Rather than argue over the use of the term, perhaps you could describe
the engineering solution that interests you (though I suppose the
question below gives a hint).
Tom Taylor
On 28/02/2012 9:06 AM, liu dapeng wrote:
...
Hi Remi,
Thanks for the discussion but the fundamental question is:
If we consider [CPE(stateful) + BR(partially stateless maybe)] as a
stateless solution,
then, why [CPE(stateless) + xlate(stateful)] is not a stateless solution?
Regards,
Dapeng Liu
...
_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
Softwires@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
