Le 2012-02-23 à 12:03, liu dapeng a écrit :

> Hi Med,
> 
> I think it is still not clear about the definition of "stateless", in
> current draft, it says:
> 
> stateless denotes a solution which does not require any per-user state
> (see Section
> 2.3 of [RFC1958]) to be maintained by any IP address sharing
> function in the Service Provider's network.
> 
> But all the candidate solutions: MAP-T/MAP-E/4rd-U all need to maitain
> state in CPE.

Hi Liu,

Even in mesh topologies, these solutions don't require CPEs to maintain states 
about other CPEs to communicate directly with them.
In this sense, they are stateless, including with the given definition.
OK? 

regards,
RD




> It is obviously contradictory with this definition. We
> need more discussion regarding the definition of "stateless".
> 
> regards,
> Dapeng Liu
> 
> 2012/2/20, [email protected] <[email protected]>:
>> Dear chairs, WG members,
>> 
>> The answers received so far are in favour of initiating a WG LC on this
>> document.
>> 
>> As an editor of the document, I would like to progress this document for the
>> next IETF meeting. Chairs, could you please issue the WG LC? Thanks.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Med
>> 
>>> -----Message d'origine-----
>>> De : [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> Envoyé : samedi 11 février 2012 09:30
>>> À : BOUCADAIR Mohamed OLNC/NAD/TIP
>>> Cc : [email protected]
>>> Objet : Re: [Softwires] Closing
>>> draft-ietf-softwire-stateless-4v6-motivation
>>> 
>>> In your previous mail you wrote:
>>> 
>>>> (1) Either issue a WG LC, or
>>> 
>>> +1
>>> 
>>> [email protected]
>>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Softwires mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> ------
> Best Regards,
> Dapeng Liu
> _______________________________________________
> Softwires mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

_______________________________________________
Softwires mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires

Reply via email to